Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 20:47:50 -0300
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>,
	Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Synchronize with imath upstream
Message-ID: <20190205234750.GA2774@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20190203173650.GA18487@fetter.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-Feb-03, David Fetter wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 07:07:36AM +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> > >>>>> "Noah" == Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:

> > So far, expressed opinions have run about 4:2 in favour of allowing
> > mixed declarations and code.
> 
> +1 for this.

Just curious, why do you care?  If you want to use such constructs in
extension code, you can add it in your makefiles.

I'm -1 for this myself.  I think there are a few places that could
benefit from it, but my fear is that many *more* places would get worse.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services