Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h38zP-0001Xj-N0 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:40:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h38zO-0006zc-Gp for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:40:22 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h38zN-0006zC-FP for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:40:22 +0000 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h38zK-00086I-Ei for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:40:20 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2870218C9; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:40:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:40:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=H0BNLCdOtN8pDaTII7eweCN18SV V9s3FfT26qfbtbcs=; b=tL/Y7ZA78UGHeqHVMoSaPf5QMJ68yKJPJT3N+6xcxsv eXF50+np/VVrIfjiBvmQIhTYq7JgNXwll81/5FuZv//nY5NdkjUKeDwaPRCfMbP2 adqpo0W+sqOOELXfCRvtxoTj0EqB01CLcc6u0Lt1AFay0qNbu98O/iOK8e+gKyLD /7Ktv5tVHLz1CMX+Jc9HjoIN4y3DVBK3ODypIcbnrGk9GkJ4aOvuKitcX3T5UsJR XEpIz51ubaWuVZikkfhNiN73IByKfZBuaC43I7EIDq2KvkUHm05jf+NQYl2ZS8Ws qfmTi3mXufegvbH9z9RGqjdsUNpStNl5pyzn4Kg99Tw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=H0BNLC dOtN8pDaTII7eweCN18SVV9s3FfT26qfbtbcs=; b=HNbbMGqVCxKHriScrek9tA RPS85hWPCICTB5pO1IGhupEJKcWHsLE9anMaOmXiVyrjSo57oBVK0MLTJ8MbSMTM Ub5N7EVHfo3zxDDojnzjQjkMIFm9j7TMSeaMFaclvXg39+wWeLd8MR2cQDm22t7/ UKdazl9qdMkTspg0gee0NB4BcAfRyQkGzJBAW5a09hMeAdo31Hb3/gHUJk3ol4of 4ahA7pCv+nbXiNhuyBe+BBGhYZ9USfwo6K/9UJGVsY8iVtzrcWd7pDcc3QONLTjW 5F41ydAmmyOv2TyoSgw8szwqR4g2p6HlllcLkLg99WCP4wi0SpEGfpdpb/VIgRcg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrgeehgddvfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddv necuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghruceomhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqh huihgvrhdrgiihiieqnecukfhppeeiuddrvdduhedrudefjedrudeivdenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiienucevlhhush htvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (c137162.net61215.cablenet.ne.jp [61.215.137.162]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EB78B10336; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:40:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:40:12 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Robert Haas Cc: Postgres hackers Subject: Re: pgsql: Removed unused variable, openLogOff. Message-ID: <20190311004012.GC1818@paquier.xyz> References: <20190306235251.GA17293@paquier.xyz> <20190307141116.GC26628@paquier.xyz> <20190308012752.GC4099@paquier.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pAwQNkOnpTn9IO2O" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190308012752.GC4099@paquier.xyz> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --pAwQNkOnpTn9IO2O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:27:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > After sleeping on it, let's live with just switching to nleft in the > message, without openLogOff as that's the second time folks complain > about the previous code. So I just propose the attached. Robert, > others, any objections? Perhaps you would prefer fixing it yourself? Okay, done. -- Michael --pAwQNkOnpTn9IO2O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAlyFrmwACgkQnvQgOdby QH0W6w/+O8hRXXHp3s0EXHDsVxhJJi0WiX6IVKX0KOV/HD/OmZLf0Em970bi/iif 1Osq461U1XV7nTH+25mmN4WnmtcteDYyiHMWIlR1DdOgLF3TxfQI8UZUMJTKbLLA EvbCaWrAkRQo2g9lx5npJfFIzw6APQ4fZFO8ruEArbyOQL8WPmCKZFXbkPqcS/rE ljoXVmVuFH/8FJVuVQ9QDXofdbqEjVwQz/RlrSgE3o7ILKQvAKIf79TFo2HYT6VU i5muByDJO+exZ1VInkQHLeK5qSVCuSAlqCHFxurBs+irMWmLz8IfcEyaZ7eaJW7X 9wb3XrGheneqR9KFpVwGFyRewCOvvXX880+FBh+5Zc/tlzccYUVXq7ZnJNP5Xai8 Ym3plaKHLIFDu0AJ0EsD4T2S9t1Ey34XzlyLnhLffWlGvCSB2KZHpmw6ULS6DSOG gIcMNpOg1mjElUyX3OW86JeiWcQPL2z5/jCsrFEZRLREWKO82DHy7doez2OGuPVA TkhFk07s7GGTUxkodhCQHNdYX/JepFvT/rWAAfU8jYGszoBqmwzOZzFBdBFQR/Lr dfWc4LOtrPxU0jYjQ36rE93gDLgXQcd1uwtNM0jZjWzebZQLzS5J6TCcBiYxQ+8w e5cOnxtVHYw5JvJKxBl9gdc9oOjpLq80fvUR6CRDs/dn93QyGeE= =Kuw8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pAwQNkOnpTn9IO2O--