Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 05:58:47 +0200
From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>,
	Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+
Message-ID: <20190429035846.GA2954@fetter.org>
References: <20190424062623.GF28936@fetter.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904240949080.27327@lancre>
 <CA+FpmFdx2aDtyiVD2av9+QAunA1L5uscm3dL1SFbcOs8-W678g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+FpmFeurtDiutfh2yv0T4S=zY0iegcSStR-5xJ9H7vP2XKQsg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190427041849.GL28936@fetter.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904270844180.29865@lancre>
 <20190427174330.GN28936@fetter.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904272214030.29865@lancre>
 <20190428151541.GQ28936@fetter.org>
 <12062.1556471641@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <12062.1556471641@sss.pgh.pa.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 01:14:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Not particularly on topic, but: including a patch version number in your
> subject headings is pretty unfriendly IMO, because it breaks threading
> for people whose MUAs do threading by matching up subject lines.

Thanks for letting me know about those MUAs.

> I don't actually see the point of the [PATCH] annotation at all,
> because the thread is soon going to contain lots of messages with
> the same subject line but no embedded patch.  Like this one.  So
> it's just noise with no information content worth noticing.

OK

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate