Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 16:33:18 +0200
From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
	Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
	Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
	Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>,
	Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de>,
	Artur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
	Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
	Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
	David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Message-ID: <20190711143318.GL24679@fetter.org>
References: 
 <CA+q6zcXnesTL5ALJ+_M6gmP+7ehBL9eMJqy25hhD3Gx44AOCpw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+q6zcWtU3Vopo3xbmyVazQBjhqj5CfAy7MTEuwmi46s2fq5AA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRBhHabV06m_-n6qjmR-BQC=+t740EJs4Gu5Ck0jzNQMhQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+q6zcW+n0q7NVvYi2rHxcME2OXnL4V7zQRLvKkiETGB8Nxvag@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+q6zcU=CiNNo45m40sSGRLa6AGEuBUdEiqN8NUyA+A5QYFXbg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+q6zcU0wS3edY2b+dQMU4qwBiQ=6-x_mwDRAp5U-a6NvHj0cA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGKj6sSu7+a_u4S7uHV_4aFiN5Es+mz1jn0nYFZErX71qA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+q6zcV3bzfSRfWu4pFich46evryijX3ELFV_zm=kPg7KALaOQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190711074723.GK24679@fetter.org>
 <CA+q6zcUJTtp_GxnX+Q7Zo5RMk+12Tw-rsqLGnh+76hzJ3MH5LA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+q6zcUJTtp_GxnX+Q7Zo5RMk+12Tw-rsqLGnh+76hzJ3MH5LA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 04:30:46PM +0200, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:47 AM David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> >
> > Looks great!
> >
> > The tutorial piece has bit-rotted slightly. Please find attached a
> > patch atop yours that fixes it.
> 
> Indeed, I've missed this change, thank you! Although there supposed to be an
> upperindex, not numupper (since the latter is just a number of upper indexes).

Oops! Fooled by a suggestion from the compiler. My bad for not
checking more carefully. Thanks for making this happen.

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate