Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hv0SG-0004t6-Me for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 14:28:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hv0SE-0001OA-M8 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 14:28:46 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hv0SE-0001O3-8s for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 14:28:46 +0000 Received: from mail-qk1-x744.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::744]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hv0SB-0004Ve-4C for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 14:28:45 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-x744.google.com with SMTP id t8so63005367qkt.1 for ; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 07:28:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pNbT7yCqnFFjMoZksw6VQFQPw4Z+6pw0QifhHx6DoQw=; b=elXd9t0spuTJ8nQXZp3lt7b1cBQpCmL8B6tz9yJTJ0J2TwZxpT0ufDt6D+F4Xlmuus WTJ7Gd2dp9I3yADJCl4brRoQ5K4ggKPgnU6HuF+9smmnsNy1abk/DiAyOviT5pVK4OPC WOszbMBUS2YCJWGCzcOqgvScIhjw6u1T7r33RFYS4Y9sOXLkDHO57Vdw/6AulhE+E+tw z9sI47Nf4N8U++QFZPeNsNBX1oTI6SmjFPQD4vPjRh0B/WHGZyoSWifa60DOePUKY1Di imYIXqXKrkwjRBth2Og9tfVp3s9mPZ9qmHRzUKXG7ebXaLqJADbjUAIKrF9koqPdDzIU Wcbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=pNbT7yCqnFFjMoZksw6VQFQPw4Z+6pw0QifhHx6DoQw=; b=lBhUOboya/VU7Hhq6m3xDiUO44dcn2FDTYLyYNDcykIcGyyq6NwtrzF9DuCb05k/Gd OF6GMuT17iczF4mm/TPSxFGp6o0i0hS64j9C/DGk0z/ELrt1BY/jrmovLqiOWu8VVmAI 2Co9FxwQhCh08H08kPo8PijEJpISpxMHnjFzzYJ/+VSRyeknVPrZXrM3SYDLUJ9XbpuE oWwN+NforkBRlXIWFvWtcSwn47FKWm1MIho5WzAgPaZXHCbiGHcwBuyvo1KV54DnYDJg 7MonFrDX7AcoN0lkFyKbG80eCNCXc9VKTwkgy3nTAG9S6GgOMn1qkJkqwmmZu+HaAVli TzjA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVZJwRy0clPZuMhJ5+ENh9NX6JGIFHGrHZupvEFeCXTBtycFd2S jIiX7aWgaQmWHVebW514RHpF4Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyN2scTImrzwY5/Jf7nJiSLIuVj5Ht6VGbKu4lXiqa8FRsxhqG2fmRk7Fgte5BgcRY+3WFhHg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:5204:: with SMTP id g4mr3313301qkb.35.1565101720468; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 07:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nimloth.alvh.no-ip.org ([216.155.75.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i22sm46309707qti.30.2019.08.06.07.28.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Aug 2019 07:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nimloth.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5D6FA120CC4; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:30:53 -0400 (-04) Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:30:53 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: yuzuko Cc: shawn wang , Shawn Wang , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Problem with default partition pruning Message-ID: <20190806133053.GA23706@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="+QahgC5+KEYLbs62" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190805143920.GA6232@alvherre.pgsql> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2019-Aug-05, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > So we have three locations for that test; one is where it currently is, > which handles a small subset of the cases. The other is where Amit > first proposed putting it, which handles some additional cases; and the > third one is where your latest patch puts it, which seems to handle all > cases. Isn't that what Amit is saying? If that's correct (and that's > what I want to imply with the comment changes I proposed), then we > should just accept that version of the patch. ... actually, there's a fourth possible location, which is outside the per-partitioning-attribute loop. Nothing in the moved block is to be done per attribute, so it'd be wasted work AFAICS. I propose the attached. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v7_ignore_contradictory_where_clauses_at_partprune_step.patch" diff --git a/src/backend/partitioning/partprune.c b/src/backend/partitioning/partprune.c index 09c4ed83b6..2ed1e44c18 100644 --- a/src/backend/partitioning/partprune.c +++ b/src/backend/partitioning/partprune.c @@ -849,10 +849,11 @@ get_matching_partitions(PartitionPruneContext *context, List *pruning_steps) * the context's steps list. Each step is assigned a step identifier, unique * even across recursive calls. * - * If we find clauses that are mutually contradictory, or a pseudoconstant - * clause that contains false, we set context->contradictory to true and - * return NIL (that is, no pruning steps). Caller should consider all - * partitions as pruned in that case. + * If we find clauses that are mutually contradictory, or contradictory with + * the partitioning constraint, or a pseudoconstant clause that contains + * false, we set context->contradictory to true and return NIL (that is, no + * pruning steps). Caller should consider all partitions as pruned in that + * case. */ static List * gen_partprune_steps_internal(GeneratePruningStepsContext *context, @@ -942,35 +943,15 @@ gen_partprune_steps_internal(GeneratePruningStepsContext *context, } else { + PartitionPruneStep *orstep; + /* * The arg didn't contain a clause matching this * partition key. We cannot prune using such an arg. * To indicate that to the pruning code, we must * construct a dummy PartitionPruneStepCombine whose * source_stepids is set to an empty List. - * - * However, if we can prove using constraint exclusion - * that the clause refutes the table's partition - * constraint (if it's sub-partitioned), we need not - * bother with that. That is, we effectively ignore - * this OR arm. */ - List *partconstr = context->rel->partition_qual; - PartitionPruneStep *orstep; - - if (partconstr) - { - partconstr = (List *) - expression_planner((Expr *) partconstr); - if (context->rel->relid != 1) - ChangeVarNodes((Node *) partconstr, 1, - context->rel->relid, 0); - if (predicate_refuted_by(partconstr, - list_make1(arg), - false)) - continue; - } - orstep = gen_prune_step_combine(context, NIL, PARTPRUNE_COMBINE_UNION); arg_stepids = lappend_int(arg_stepids, orstep->step_id); @@ -1038,6 +1019,29 @@ gen_partprune_steps_internal(GeneratePruningStepsContext *context, */ } + /* + * If the clause contradicts the partition constraint, mark the clause + * as contradictory and we're done. This is particularly helpful to + * prune the default partition. + */ + if (context->rel->partition_qual) + { + List *partconstr; + + partconstr = (List *) + expression_planner((Expr *) context->rel->partition_qual); + if (context->rel->relid != 1) + ChangeVarNodes((Node *) partconstr, 1, + context->rel->relid, 0); + if (predicate_refuted_by(partconstr, + list_make1(clause), + false)) + { + context->contradictory = true; + return NIL; + } + } + /* * See if we can match this clause to any of the partition keys. */ diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out index 2d3229fd73..6ccc91d390 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out @@ -592,6 +592,24 @@ explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a < 1 or (a > 20 and a < 25); Filter: ((a < 1) OR ((a > 20) AND (a < 25))) (5 rows) +-- where clause contradicts sub-partition's constraint +explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 20 or a = 40; + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------- + Append + -> Seq Scan on rlp4_1 + Filter: ((a = 20) OR (a = 40)) + -> Seq Scan on rlp5_default + Filter: ((a = 20) OR (a = 40)) +(5 rows) + +explain (costs off) select * from rlp3 where a = 20; /* empty */ + QUERY PLAN +-------------------------- + Result + One-Time Filter: false +(2 rows) + -- redundant clauses are eliminated explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a > 1 and a = 10; /* only default */ QUERY PLAN diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql index efdedaaeb8..a26c2f0e72 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql @@ -85,6 +85,10 @@ explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 29; explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a >= 29; explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a < 1 or (a > 20 and a < 25); +-- where clause contradicts sub-partition's constraint +explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 20 or a = 40; +explain (costs off) select * from rlp3 where a = 20; /* empty */ + -- redundant clauses are eliminated explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a > 1 and a = 10; /* only default */ explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a > 1 and a >=15; /* rlp3 onwards, including default */ --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62--