Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCRPO-0005Oy-97 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:41:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCRPM-0004uT-Hx for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:41:52 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCRPM-0004uM-9g for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:41:52 +0000 Received: from mail-qt1-x843.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::843]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCRPE-0005JX-Hs for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:41:51 +0000 Received: by mail-qt1-x843.google.com with SMTP id 3so15486000qta.1 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:41:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=hpdt0/BQ1V7Qsw2PLstwgq5ElQ6+0qKO7CtHKrZso2w=; b=Fd5F4/EWB3BVH7IfAKvENqOLNmYNQkaF6NMgZDfwqtyNzax5jCNe95lzVREHl4RGRi AGo8Obuz3IXklWngxgfebLzr4zA5VjdlfSMvgSFf1gdH4sZLkkqj+YdQHXZVCs10RzJe NnkMZkdIuziCW5RzWQbb/O7c36/wCP2m+mAb1y/VI1NvZF/rt5PHyKwWZZ+OMrvgDZeI 2uyCJ26DmaVCMrLP9ljg3ZLBRtn2tGH7PtJpatOjunU70EWiqUUxwse5zdkX/9m9OAxc +WCFd2QXrlBfycKBsddtMr2DVpLsV8AOVRZL2RzC9brUmXL1u5WfVolL3uZghh52/F0Z 8DHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=hpdt0/BQ1V7Qsw2PLstwgq5ElQ6+0qKO7CtHKrZso2w=; b=WV1B1PCe/GPWWlhwDGq5oB3606H8RFvsCD1REKUtL2LtE+a3RDt6FSK8MBedoe+58l PTZOJZ9iirBK4GeqVOm4QszG7Ay4zcoDtEfjT48DR3FAIGbXyAIkkyzam4U8OjepjAEU YjpTu3FA0kWEHcIi0WVE/0FYCRivOZL7nvq58dy8j51HYjr2rArEZy6aDWV7yem2j3Zs 9bCGkn6itE4l7wwX5KoRO7lCwCURSHVNbJrsgDf6doZy5Uh7m4ZF1ml6EHoEmeIcerLZ XJwLLC5O1O6Nx7ddv/FRqmiv0AE/qnriJQKBwaqL6u3uZU6cw/kBT3F7DBQYlSvvCaxf Zjiw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWXIfsyst2VzC/PiyxLwTYcjhQPAec/HQMt3yoq2eoL59XRATnT 3sKuQDbKcmwBqagwI9/fjSbJX//Y9g44EcA8+vNYk1OiGOCczuQ+npwZSjJ7OnDR6ATW9Ry9apU QS/k+9/nOUxm6ZXqZ2JLTHgUJXwO5i+KLBgaki1ZjWS+rWU3AVzb+scH/CaScXEtX7oog6MgfRj VAjbW9vbvthfzrg9nU X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyRQr2yhs8ZFX4VVPlaVUehRIZ0KrCEcO14GDYhV8hmMPkD8LvPQadgSD76opkRJ8deFOnrhg== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e48b:: with SMTP id n11mr126091qvl.38.1569256901952; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nimloth.alvh.no-ip.org ([177.154.139.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j7sm6920436qtc.73.2019.09.23.09.41.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nimloth.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 21722120AFC; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:41:37 -0300 (-03) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:41:37 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Marina Polyakova Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Victor Wagner Subject: Re: pg_upgrade check fails on Solaris 10 Message-ID: <20190923164137.GA18245@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 2019-Sep-23, Marina Polyakova wrote: > On 2019-09-18 17:36, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > On 2019-Sep-17, Marina Polyakova wrote: > > > > > We got an error for pg_upgrade check on the branch REL_11_STABLE > > > (commit > > > 40ad4202513c72f5c1beeb03e26dfbc8890770c0) on Solaris 10 because IIUC > > > the > > > argument to the sed command is not enclosed in quotation marks (see > > > [1]): > > > > Hmm, I'm surprised it has taken this long to detect the problem. > > Looking at the members of buildfarm [1] castoroides and protosciurus - IIUC > they do not check pg_upgrade. And I was that lucky one who have run the > branch with the latest commits at our buildfarm... Argh. But I meant "how come nobody runs pg_upgrade tests on old Solaris?" > > I have pushed it to all branches that have src/bin/pg_upgrade (namely, > > 9.5 onwards), thanks. I hope this won't make the msys/mingw machines > > angry ;-) > > Thank you! I ran pg_upgrade tests for MSYS, everything is fine. > > The branch REL9_4_STABLE (commit 8a17afe84be6fefe76d0d2f4d26c5ee075e64487) > has the same issue - according to the release table [2] it is still > supported, isn't it?... Yeah, but pg_upgrade is in contrib/ in 9.4, so nowhere as good as from 9.5 onwards; and it's going to die in a couple of months anyway, so I'm not thrilled about fixing this there. If you *need* to have this fixed in 9.4, we can do that, but do you? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services