Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iaskm-0008CI-W1 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 02:45:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iasjn-0002re-1s for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 02:43:59 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iasjm-0002rX-IC for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 02:43:58 +0000 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iasjf-0000Vb-RF for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 02:43:57 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1338222629; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:43:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:43:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=sXU9wuBrR+rQddrP09fyvrjicHB awqcC81kDjouCksY=; b=F1xdb0kbkATJNZLrXX6UqYZHBr03NVK5BrLip3tCFXO mv2J2/zd5AKL9Ezua+90R3ImLmvw0S94ddhUM86bnn40NGGDQtlq3jgCcU8JTPIr ctfkrmmWwiuTyB1z3xUPbSMjnyHxlWMzyBA/mUzplqt0bzci9bxRXP0oH96wOL65 s5awATGhvHb/YbmVbDmUW6sMOIvrdu8xAEpM47eUlg1iDe2egXUBm6mOPfqctKyY YPs1lIZhS1YN/JrhuFfPfb6y3bjHPeS7YS2SizqXvuRdzrQKgI0JmiX3qcPKpZaT M7/XEt0cOs2rEnEE9Mb7rVmD4Suw4EUYf2PePCjuxiw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=sXU9wu BrR+rQddrP09fyvrjicHBawqcC81kDjouCksY=; b=BidyNt11YpPCUc7YD60q72 efwcK+jc+3NCupC3O8Yrn2vlUNqVwzBW1WB6Kr20JvHcTJ9joKxasMX/eXGx+heB 3Qly+S+xUie2LIgpGtlBooyvQs6+3M2o8ZjqYqT5XNLYAKJwVkwQE4LwGflwilsJ nUdMT5D2uUCt2UOpb5649/vKqiNUuXAZJv4AIS3V0XwUICUYizqFQ/eqoWpbcMwe ZGAHjQ6Mxf7KR/Zeka4C5dgV2hs6FPOWttW+XGif2wIrd3z1zgUhV2zetJE0CN7n kNmOUBqj9crSAlysqoT0DQYFJ2h8L30KJboQCXRV3fgQ4zLuXM6+5bA7+PTAnQ3A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudejtddggeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne gfrhhlucfvnfffucdljedtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddt vdenucfhrhhomhepofhitghhrggvlhcurfgrqhhuihgvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehprg hquhhivghrrdighiiiqeenucfkphepuddukedrvdeguddrvdehtddruddujeenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiienucevlh hushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (mp76f1fa75.ap.nuro.jp [118.241.250.117]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ADEE33060236; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:43:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 11:43:45 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Tom Lane Cc: Magnus Hagander , Daniel Gustafsson , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: Update minimum SSL version Message-ID: <20191130024345.GD99291@paquier.xyz> References: <224FD25C-BA10-44FA-95AA-F97C35FB3BB0@yesql.se> <20191129125727.GN2505@paquier.xyz> <13786.1575041447@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="at6+YcpfzWZg/htY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13786.1575041447@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --at6+YcpfzWZg/htY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:30:47AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > What's the impact going to be on buildfarm members with older openssl > installations? Perhaps "none", if they aren't running the ssl test > suite, but we should be clear about it. The buildfarm logs don't directly report the version of OpenSSL used as far as I recalled, and a quick lookup shows that.. Anyway, I recall that all Windows buildfarm members linking to OpenSSL use at least 1.0.2 on HEAD. For the others, I would be ready to suspect that some of them are still using 0.9.8 and 1.0.0. Anyway, as we still support OpenSSL down to 0.9.8 on HEAD, shouldn't we just patch the SSL TAP tests to make sure that we don't enforce an incorrect minimum version at configuration time? [... thinks more ...] Actually, no, what I am writing here is incorrect. We should make sure of that the default configuration is correct at initdb time, and the patch does not do that. -- Michael --at6+YcpfzWZg/htY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl3h12EACgkQnvQgOdby QH0Dxg//aj+pYhnqN2+DCp1vblUsw+vcEjd3CaH3n08itiS01+7/tt1SNsP8CfvR VWgp1t5XyQhF70RNwIqOOFW63PPMqWdgzSTByoms9Sj+fG8buneVu+GUxaYfkkMn 216yaqppcqc8OuxWo4gLk7ZmhJ8i6lWXyrAcxRuhW8E/+6VINAmM566NSGqWWzCs Q4ffiJHx1f7qQL6kr1TqcnUCTqbBrwmhHh69vpkOysLyx9bcMiJDp5dB+1VSvJtO rIJs/QHNtpt5e2suwmByvJ1ZXoiIZvcWe6BqtQ0ARks3JRJ/2yHsipG2vgiNxPPX rtEBU9wqtHpJkCMZ5WolVvAiqWWB8lhJ45KcuuuSUx7S2OFhGcn+zoZyA78wzABg 8PqcYbwwACt9s+Nwuv2vQNDt08XS2iLbbI5YYfkJ6W45WzybCinVr7MBPcDY3AwJ v3uGYQ8q2pgKI+lmVhD5b2zemMf4gtm+9/nAf+9xXmZyg5MCjOrLthaaFF/PNKEh hDbqTFINKvP0ncvpRfd3aUWm8oRKq6xpB6H2ky0JdqZTilJMl7Mxb4IM52ts+9QK PfC7ViT5e+EJQYtGqIKoSBn1eu9RU43VJ+p2XJpZ5l71OTEa/iZaimmU7t2cNCvm o6GJEszWrM1OguHGRng6Up2S83KohlXWaGfKZmWDEvSOi/XKagQ= =LKxa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --at6+YcpfzWZg/htY--