Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iczFE-0001PP-RN for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 22:05:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iczFA-0000CI-Th for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 22:05:04 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iczFA-0000CB-Fs for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 22:05:04 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::342]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iczF7-0005ij-7H for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 22:05:03 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id y23so8350630wma.0 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 14:05:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7sQPOwoApvIkmtMA53uvf9nPrLlqp3PX6dA3Tik9lgs=; b=AAhxwkJX/+P9ObVxnTXv7D0T6/MU0ooHzvq8cOXiNbecimv14ImUzYaiCCLSxC8xmw Anu/276Ke7J5GWC2D7BOhOBnwTmJlqAXQAWOoybQ0/lTliwmrVT4YnBr09KGKGmMm29Z E3S/ABonvP+3HK6Zfg0JveZEa1uCp5GtoyDGfWtsgRkHUfcI44EcBAfVbf5IjikfnXh4 cyy5iq0RN7IK47er7t/4p4/9V5HwNjZkOnFk0/Bi/PnjanmeubzOfX55H9O/xaLb30Vb J0chjILIQ491t/+bLV4zgupC/EbTTlcuFCvBIVLGRd9UbS67DVuX26iq2iO5H7O9J/kv ZfOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7sQPOwoApvIkmtMA53uvf9nPrLlqp3PX6dA3Tik9lgs=; b=ugg0aZdMVHg6SUe97M0yx5mgRCfkCOVsgH+fZ8+ypxsEcrRXfK1ZtK5Po1CRbos7Hl M7zc1IJccWPTQSB2W6L3ZPTPe/j9vFmBPPSUKULo843OCzR5KkHIFnR7kW42gadQu7y6 ojB1VMLq+AEhKma47zK8Cw2hsFPqCPTkvY83KEssr1i9O3klbeQs48J+SUXw2wZQgV4k EjFUfasANTKCzGIUIl5y+oyzfF3o4KcFg5EeyZMTshspX9lDcgp4C3EPju78JGwg50ew sG9rRlVyqfoRAcJibCJaAAgJ4m0PfiACNhnFO9u89ybI/YRq4xSG+H0tVpcqCJU5Vd75 pkzg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVCQdBAT/DhoTkLLmquPAdIel2CFGr8qwXgfX6c1Vw4vLqaCyEc HkH5/6w/5+7if88BnnFSCvbhtw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwfwJSVSia8T6wlizWHjZ9kZ32uiJDaAcYGjvAv9xsIVNFh/H3HpJZrALdMP0WF4BhknqKhHg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6485:: with SMTP id y127mr7756013wmb.19.1575583500259; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 14:05:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-86-49-253-92.net.upcbroadband.cz. [86.49.253.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v14sm13938704wrm.28.2019.12.05.14.04.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 Dec 2019 14:04:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 23:04:57 +0100 From: Tomas Vondra To: Jeff Davis Cc: andres@anarazel.de, Taylor Vesely , Adam Lee , Melanie Plageman , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation Message-ID: <20191205220457.v3hg2vgkhpee5tfz@development> References: <20190711155520.zqipi23o3yybx7ym@development> <9be86fc1adc315f69b8af4b379087ab451008d8a.camel@j-davis.com> <20190802064405.GA94036@mars.local> <617fea8258ba3df7bc8b21cd7f3afc219f2383d9.camel@j-davis.com> <20190802152123.ichmacgx3y3x7dc3@development> <20191128174644.snpuqldt5rndjru7@development> <9723131d247b919f94699152647fa87ee0bc02c2.camel@j-davis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9723131d247b919f94699152647fa87ee0bc02c2.camel@j-davis.com> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 12:55:51PM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: >On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 18:46 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> And it's not clear to me why we should remove part of the comment >> before >> TupleHashTableHash. > >It looks like 5dfc1981 changed the signature of TupleHashTableHash >without updating the comment, so it doesn't really make sense any more. >I just updated the comment as a part of my patch, but it's not related. > >Andres, comments? Maybe we can just commit a fix for that comment and >take it out of my patch. > +1 to push that as an independent fix regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services