Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ipZ39-0005oS-6c for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 14:44:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ipZ37-0006nn-Rs for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 14:44:37 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ipZ37-0006lX-F7 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 14:44:37 +0000 Received: from mail-qt1-x843.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::843]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ipZ34-0001WW-DZ for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 14:44:37 +0000 Received: by mail-qt1-x843.google.com with SMTP id i13so1218001qtr.3 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:44:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=JEpCbR17Z32hRFfUJ4PEXOAwJF5sru35Ym3to5nrymA=; b=KgH+ANZzXbtov1/uOovS0owa+QLJXOZZnvbxl+FedyHYw9uQvF/Ou6Qrb8j9+gdqeA yUVSiiKTBWqoWEtDWQZp7NnLiDgErHXHNM4OObaa1FiJ2yfppzSC6ChD0wqnQk5NyqkR lmrPcH7SIa06Kz1060wpDGqOMDqXZ56eUI10AhnU2depdYe++G4d91z1/yNj0U5Vply/ yq4uHNY9VIkzpyrSzOvEZEx/6qPYssdW7a0v3NbTpKLcWa5DtekqKVYWBavlwlbXM6Fe olPIHkcXjqqKc+yddVUfrR1CYfK6B/8Or0CuBfvVy1PdnIhZ+/RhN5WUtlBpWVJrBR4s rTbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=JEpCbR17Z32hRFfUJ4PEXOAwJF5sru35Ym3to5nrymA=; b=lZWCzMYyGgnDg9RoelORUfzpqMhD2fX5FPQ0aTS2d1WDui9wiWEEUs1Yg2DUeLAN22 DdfscZXzAonChQlSJBelvuzETYNU5InKGF2oyU1wHdkJkiMOoJsswEuLvVGSOXthfxKr aXmsEEMznfiaEv2CMF/FCShHHfIgcVcBzbyaaGdsJalEUs/Q+AOlKUJTgyQP4weqa9eS KCCGPD5B9cahSZ+FtikJx8UBXAMbYkEiFdA51Z7EV5vtf9DHvxgNWuro7VnXslRaZdNu LFA+n2m4+zk/3jFCs7li/8MiHwU4fS3U4PmLtLS5yG0D+bso3aZcK0PM4JdFSUGgJDr2 3F0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVOjEIFKDfUNdmOyd3JpdPIOAOmeo317htLIds6sxhGpHFmIDoj ScutakQU/ATJ+upkrPe7pS1OSA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyOvIDEMtJRtRlOm5NsxIOdsalt4rBeeIw1habqr0RzPY4tIJODBs03/EWJq5rIn9aG/3pK9Q== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:544f:: with SMTP id d15mr8342230qtq.53.1578581072926; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:44:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from nimloth.alvh.no-ip.org ([190.217.183.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u15sm3128270qku.67.2020.01.09.06.44.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:44:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by nimloth.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4DC0B300827; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:44:29 -0300 (-03) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:44:29 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Amit Kapila Cc: Tom Lane , Noah Misch , Amit Khandekar , Andres Freund , Juan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Santamar=EDa?= Flecha , PostgreSQL Hackers , Robert Haas , Thomas Munro , Tomas Vondra Subject: Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files Message-ID: <20200109144429.GA27927@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 2020-Jan-09, Amit Kapila wrote: > In HEAD, we have a guc variable 'logical_decoding_work_mem' by which > we can control the memory usage of changes and we have used that, but > for back branches, we don't have such a control. > After the latest changes by Noah, the tern and mandrill both are > green. I will revert the test added by this patch unless there is > some strong argument to keep it. Hmm, so why not revert the test only in the back branches, given that it's not so onerous in master? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services