Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ituzO-0001Ke-34 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:58:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ituzM-00051t-Id for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:58:44 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ituzL-00051i-U6 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:58:44 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ituzF-0005CH-14 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:58:42 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id q6so3518163wro.9 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 06:58:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=V6MfJkpAiSyLAI3ERAeweSK657+ozcNZNdlvnX0juug=; b=EdYuBO6ximFE7iqKccqRI2dbCxUFP/EcFQQXmvln1igfr4VlZs/R1OrfVOcICIADWA d9HF/LFON7245STYwVJc91rxDFXqYO6aGAWuQPh5wdihWgHshIlhHGAA0iJdfzgT5FBj s1lABx2+g+LJRFILrTCTaQNP7Ui/kb8rBwQ2+X5nNPMcVCaLqPLl/5MxhXFVihbpnM4L bp2DuQO3pPCTdt4okBiaRtVurrOfVQJVI6QXirGHSEc7Fjx01bULhh/RSNSE3vwiceLv 3ssWBSRZmbc/7uvSValojNqBD72ErmqRmdQJ7xIIx3ghM7iC6LhYsBx7RBOfx8hWERAp 1dOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=V6MfJkpAiSyLAI3ERAeweSK657+ozcNZNdlvnX0juug=; b=LmoRgSLEj+RXCTue+aQFlexiVQnGB4tzS0+/MvQqb9tvcmwVA/BEv546U4sP3Wtzf5 BemI3RT0+q2HCDSlHzahJ7PUodfXnB+FsjzIsg9ubwu4mV7lSpxKotIJ/Lr4+0h1hLto s2pmDeRq7pZCVusu6komz63AHaGiyns3A9JA+TLPNEi+ds1BRjGdaZOjxQyqpC3nxISw /BxhmYPKRjn36JKIzjtnI+s0TPfydjqYovf0BtTDqakPvtfjTovdJLPdVwAA3EgdDvP4 MWFJMqeEQX6RKBx51BrcyMe6jPIXLVeEtI22nvNBKrXnNozfbHuUKq76RHLXOK2c+dKi wzfw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV+aPZU12u8n4gKGbDjZJT43QWCDwW127oGs4J/dl/K88KS+qIS 5fjRJdGO5FIrrElzwjRA+jVv8Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy/rDtSlfJB/BzxKdukD+SIENoCDDuJTfK2yIvfVxLc0L2UuM9pAcox85LCtZtGgypES/GYew== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fe4d:: with SMTP id m13mr5939013wrs.179.1579618715453; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 06:58:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (static-84-42-175-93.net.upcbroadband.cz. [84.42.175.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s16sm54517356wrn.78.2020.01.21.06.58.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 06:58:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:58:32 +0100 From: Tomas Vondra To: James Coleman Cc: Michael Paquier , Rafia Sabih , Peter Geoghegan , Simon Riggs , Shaun Thomas , Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Alexander Korotkov , Tom Lane , PostgreSQL Developers , Alvaro Herrera Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) Message-ID: <20200121145832.mge2vqb6tid4lqxa@development> References: <20190730001711.hprrcx3ntk57wuqv@development> <20190904191710.gogtnktjbvtg5zq3@development> <20190909215538.42hrv6j4z5ztcft4@development> <20190928230049.k4l2mayun7jomhxy@development> <20191129060146.GH2505@paquier.xyz> <20191201004716.cenkc33em2lnrrdl@development> <20200121142529.wpickvfefp7lok4p@development> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 09:37:01AM -0500, James Coleman wrote: >On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:25 AM Tomas Vondra > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> This patch has been marked as WoA since end of November, and there has >> been no discussion/reviews since then :-( Based on off-list discussion >> with James I don't think that's going to change in this CF, so I'll move >> it to the next CF. >> >> I plan to work on the planner part of this patch before 2020-03, with >> the hope it can still make it into 13. > >In that off-list discussion I'd mentioned to Tomas that I would still >like to work on this, just my other responsibilities at work have left >me little time to work on the most important remaining part of this >(the planner parts) since that requires a fair amount of focus and >time. > >That being said, the patch also needs some more work on improving >EXPLAIN ANALYZE output (perhaps min/max/mean or median of >memory usage number of groups in each sort mode), and I think it's far >more feasible that I can tackle that piecemeal before the next CF. > Sure, sorry if that was not clear from my message - you're of course more than welcome to continue working on this. My understanding is that won't happen by the end of this CF, hence the move to 2020-03. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services