Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 23:59:00 -0300
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
	Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
	Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>,
	Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
	pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Subject: Re: Psql patch to show access methods info
Message-ID: <20200304025900.GA7361@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPpHfdsf6B5qBWy2dRw8cWBmcfVSe7+oa7fc+ayq=Hs-AKWFeA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On 2020-Mar-04, Alexander Korotkov wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 1:33 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > I think I would like this feature to be in, but I'm not sure that the
> > shape is final yet.  My points:
> >
> > a) I don't see any use for \dA as presented; I think the \dA+ output is
> >    useful.  Therefore my preference would be that \dA presents what the
> >    latest patch has as \dA+.  I think we should leave \dA+ unimplemented
> >    for now; maybe we can use some use for it later on.
> 
> Neither \dA or \dA+ are introduced or affected by this patch.  If we
> like to change their behavior, we should probably do this separately
> from this patch.

Doh, you're right, sorry.

Looking only at the regress/expected/psql.out changes, I'm satisfied
with this version of the patch.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services