Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:24:00 +0100
From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: Kirill Bychik <kirill.bychik@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Message-ID: <20200318192400.GB69354@nol>
References: 
 <CAOBaU_aECK1Z7Nn+x=MhvEwrJzK8wyPsPtWAafjqtZN1fYjEmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAB-hujqEdFjZy=tZHeWm0BGPGs7DiahNNdrhKhN0o0YzDsofkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOBaU_Z+Z+nR5hLsAjXZhGoGosfBjrt8VWmHTWAZiR4Y5uy7oA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAB-hujoJ7dUcy=upG+3QOzrad0qWdCW+LkC10vSW2UNLVvhEbA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200317153136.GA63950@nol>
 <CAB-hujrd+8kb5o+k1dy=r3oeuxnWO_PuaQiOiPHQHc8unH5ywg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200317203222.GA44781@nol>
 <CAB-hujqi8=Tc567FVKaifVdV6f7PbFZeKzivnHX2TMaMN6RD3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200318171916.GA69354@nol>
 <CAB-hujoCsVriYB6vyAyAaTx7k9yghAz_oTOF97CQhecyzCUtQw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAB-hujoCsVriYB6vyAyAaTx7k9yghAz_oTOF97CQhecyzCUtQw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 08:48:17PM +0300, Kirill Bychik wrote:
> > I'm attaching a v5 with fp records only for temp tables, so there's no risk of
> > instability.  As I previously said I'm fine with your two patches, so unless
> > you have objections on the fpi test for temp tables or the documentation
> > changes, I believe those should be ready for committer.
>
> No objections on my side either. Thank you for your review, time and efforts!


Great, thanks also for the patches and efforts!  I'll mark the entry as RFC.