Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO6ZU-0006cr-2m for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 21:24:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO6ZS-0003W3-Uq for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 21:24:46 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO6ZS-0003Vw-Iz for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 21:24:46 +0000 Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO6ZQ-0001NU-9C for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 21:24:46 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id w70so6893244qkb.7 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:24:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telsasoft-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2iv/gw3I0bqQFzUO1RhT+gw/y3FPrIL8i9eIFl/TniU=; b=zgL6W68u2xZQqUosDntNh2wQoZwqkBvydhwulAny8uCCw2tc9871juCUwtMmlJld51 UppCe3WpoiSDcnGHMxJrWVW+HwHX+O7iCh44JuXka1+wYKR9eob0q04zQJVo4kv32Ji1 5/xSj0q7ggv4KsSjL0PEAyl61thbXs+DFkaZTz7Rg1tUFxw5qzZv0Jl15Xtld/dGm0ZA n4xLd9a8wCMC8pCmainAUiwAmkIcjHR2XpBd2GXh48T69I8OvgkQ2QSWOYYP0UZlG3Fz WSvbSLJQfFfV9uF+Mnr73KOY+wPRHJuQePpTg+kIcAz9W0mPsVqfpjQZ4Z4wEbsuADCj O9lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2iv/gw3I0bqQFzUO1RhT+gw/y3FPrIL8i9eIFl/TniU=; b=LNrz4nk6e5KtHSTEr6m6XngfXxACcs/2q5rlhHjrfXzzIW/99wegBLi4kx01TXH/jM Yfv74mduvRKi88oP5EwViP/BR3uT/XrZYFqt14mapQSd7+VoA+n+NBleVlhMPkZOJqXc uQBaLAFzMOsl+G7Al/SxwkRMDfJUBofAN+ZlqQg0HLHYEYXJbdpmTMwnNrfYF+c6qsVu ONuG4Y0QvLT4xFAaYEGpzawoyiVfHEefgYvzPG8dGDgP6LKp7GZ7X+rzmlp2iNBRDKy2 GMN6o0TuKKDyledrIO85LTAmdDvHwCDvdZ84EPlEGCTWfnH2T3Arjv8VK27CBh1+VS0b RvbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZOxoVzSd7QBp6a3V+rDwCQQ6TUwRKFIbxBsxN2Wn+CKgPzYIhf oUQBEs9JzaJFRY1ZCC34Yeaq+Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIwcFOtYjZLPj9BAnvIFFFuUFYmlx2ynVil507JoIolaQINovqJwfEwG0wL6ZT12Vtaw6TXPw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:6d2:: with SMTP id 201mr16539455qkg.154.1586813082639; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pryzbyj (charmander.telsasoft.com. [50.244.222.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w22sm7465836qkb.43.2020.04.13.14.24.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pryzbyj (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 32C75800A79; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 16:24:40 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 16:24:40 -0500 From: Justin Pryzby To: Amit Kapila Cc: Masahiko Sawada , Mahendra Singh Thalor , Dilip Kumar , Sergei Kornilov , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: doc review for parallel vacuum Message-ID: <20200413212440.GB2228@telsasoft.com> References: <20200322021801.GB2563@telsasoft.com> <20200407045551.GI2228@telsasoft.com> <20200410134644.GB2228@telsasoft.com> <20200413083015.GQ2228@telsasoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 03:22:06PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 2:00 PM Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > |Copy the index > > |bulk-deletion result returned from ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup to > > |the DSM segment if it's the first time [???] because they allocate locally > > |and it's possible that an index will be vacuumed by a different > > |vacuum process the next time." > > > > Is it correct to say: "..if it's the first iteration" and "different process on > > the next iteration" ? Or "cycle" ? > > > > "cycle" sounds better. I have changed the patch as per your latest > comments. Let me know what you think? Looks good. One more change: [-Even if-]{+If+} this option is specified with the [-option-]{+option,+} Remove "even" and add comma. Thanks, -- Justin