Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYcGR-0006Fo-3K for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 21:16:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYcGP-000670-W6 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 21:16:33 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYcGP-000661-P2 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 21:16:33 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYcGN-0001m9-4d for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 21:16:33 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYcGL-0004Uh-M6; Tue, 12 May 2020 17:16:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:16:29 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Alvaro Herrera Cc: Amit Langote , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft Message-ID: <20200512211629.GC4666@momjian.us> References: <20200507124849.GE3649@momjian.us> <20200512174738.GA7857@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200512174738.GA7857@alvherre.pgsql> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:47:38PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2020-May-07, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > OK, I have moved her name to be first. FYI, this commit was backpatched > > back through PG 11, though the commit message doesn't mention that. > > At some point I became an avid user of our src/tools/git_changelog, and > then it stopped making sense for me to highlight in the commit message > the fact that the commit is back-patched, since it's so obvious there. > Maybe that's wrong and I should get back in the habit of mentioning it. Uh, not sure. I don't need it since, as you said, src/tools/git_changelog covers it, but someone got confused since they looked at just the commit message without looking at src/tools/git_changelog. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +