Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkxhR-0006na-OA for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:35:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkxhP-0005K0-Eq for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:35:27 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkxhP-0005Jg-7v for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:35:27 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkxhL-0005YS-D0 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:35:25 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkxhG-0002hD-N5; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:35:18 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:35:18 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Thomas Munro Cc: Daniel Gustafsson , Andres Freund , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: language cleanups in code and docs Message-ID: <20200615223518.GD12121@momjian.us> References: <20200615182235.x7lch5n6kcjq4aue@alap3.anarazel.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:53:34AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 7:04 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > > On 15 Jun 2020, at 20:22, Andres Freund wrote: > > > > Thanks for picking this up! > > > > > 1) 'postmaster'. As changing that would be somewhat invasive, the word > > > is a bit more ambiguous, and it's largely just internal, I've left > > > this alone for now. I personally would rather see this renamed as > > > supervisor, which'd imo actually would also be a lot more > > > descriptive. I'm willing to do the work, but only if there's at least > > > some agreement. > > > > FWIW, I've never really liked the name postmaster as I don't think it conveys > > meaning. I support renaming to supervisor or a similar term. > > +1. Postmaster has always sounded like a mailer daemon or something, > which we ain't. Postmaster is historically confused with the postmaster email account: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmaster_(computing) -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee