Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:47:34 +0200
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>,
	Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>,
	Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: list of extended statistics on psql
Message-ID: <20200829214734.u5zs66su2h3ezizn@development>
References: <d4fe2cf0-9aa9-8182-25d1-230dd6b98138@nttcom.co.jp_1>
 <20200827235323.GA13919@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200827235323.GA13919@alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 07:53:23PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>+1 for the general idea, and +1 for \dX being the syntax to use
>
>IMO the per-type columns should show both the type being enabled as
>well as it being built.
>
>(How many more stat types do we expect -- Tomas?  I wonder if having one
>column per type is going to scale in the long run.)
>

I wouldn't expect a huge number of types. I can imagine maybe twice the
current number of types, but not much more. But I'm not sure the output
is easy to read even now ...


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services