Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXV1d-00028H-Mx for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:52:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXV1c-0005xY-2s for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:52:56 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXV1b-0005xQ-SF for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:52:55 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXV1V-00041p-ES for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:52:54 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXV1U-0003dc-9P; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:52:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:52:48 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: John Naylor Cc: pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: cutting down the TODO list thread Message-ID: <20201027195248.GA13838@momjian.us> References: <20201027194614.GR4951@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201027194614.GR4951@momjian.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:46:14PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:24:35PM -0400, John Naylor wrote: > > As I mentioned in [1], I've volunteered to clear out the TODO list of items > > that appear to be too difficult, controversial, or otherwise not worth doing to > > warrant being listed there. I'll be working a few sections at a time, and every > > so often I'll have a list of proposed items for removal. If I don't hear > > objections, I'll remove the items after a few days while going through the next > > set. > > > > Where there's an email thread, I've skimmed a few messages to get a sense of > > the community's thoughts on it. Where easily determined, I've taken age into > > account, insofar as something from 2017 is going to get much more benefit of > > doubt than something from 2008. I've added after each item a phrase that sums > > up the reason I believe it doesn't belong anymore. Feedback welcome, of course, > > although I suspect there won't be much. > > Thanks for working on this. It certainly needs new eyes (not mine). ;-) > > I am fine reomving all the items below. I am kind of disappointed we > have these _stuck_ items, but I don't see a clear way forward, so let's > just remove them and see what requests we get for them. Do any of these limitations need to be documented before removing them from the TODO list? -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee