Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1krTVE-0000ai-1W for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:18:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1krTVA-0008Gb-4a for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:18:00 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1krTV9-0008GU-UG for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:17:59 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1krTV7-0004T0-Bw for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:17:59 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1krTV2-0000N4-6A; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:17:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:17:52 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: "David G. Johnston" Cc: Stephen Frost , Alastair Turner , Michael Paquier , PostgreSQL-development , Masahiko Sawada Subject: Re: Proposed patch for key managment Message-ID: <20201221221752.GA886@momjian.us> References: <20201219165837.GH28841@momjian.us> <20201220225909.GJ16415@tamriel.snowman.net> <20201221003321.GO16415@tamriel.snowman.net> <20201221023855.GC27507@tamriel.snowman.net> <20201221214434.GL28841@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 03:00:32PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > I agree with Stephen; so maybe that part of the Wiki needs to be updated > instead of having it sit there for use as a hammer when someone disagrees with > a proffered patch. > > Or maybe consider that "a patch" doesn't only mean "implement" - it is simply > another language through which desirability and design can also be > communicated.  The author gets to decide how wordy their prose is and choosing > a wordy but concise language that is understandable by the vast majority of the > target audience seems like it should be considered acceptable. If you want to debate that TODO section, you will need to start a new thread. I suggest Alastair's patch also appear in a new thread. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee