Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0WwF-0004SY-Tt for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:47:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0WwE-0008MR-R3 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:47:22 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0WwE-0008MF-Jm for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:47:22 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0WwC-0003N0-GH for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:47:21 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0WwB-0006oH-8N; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:47:19 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:47:19 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: Robert Haas Cc: Thomas Munro , PostgreSQL-development , Stephen Frost , Masahiko Sawada Subject: Re: Key management with tests Message-ID: <20210115214719.GE8740@momjian.us> References: <20210101045047.GB30966@momjian.us> <20210101060750.GA7432@momjian.us> <20210109181736.GB19555@momjian.us> <20210110010816.GC19555@momjian.us> <20210110024529.GD19555@momjian.us> <20210110145116.GE19555@momjian.us> <20210112170409.GN4320@momjian.us> <20210115204926.GD8740@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:23:22PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:49 PM Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I am planning to apply this next week. > > I don't think that's appropriate. Several prominent community members > have told you that the patch, as committed the first time, needed a > lot more work. There hasn't been enough time between then and now for > you, or anyone, to do that amount of work. This patch needs detailed > and substantial review from senior community members, and multiple > rounds of feedback and improvement, before it should be considered for > commit. > > I am not even sure there is a consensus on the design, without which > any commit is always premature. If people want changes, I need to hear about it here. I have address everything people have mentioned in these threads so far. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee