Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:27:50 -0300
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Matthieu Garrigues <matthieu.garrigues@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Message-ID: <20210216162750.GA13534@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGRY4nxO2JafmwJMzwzHuQC_3sXNw+nKs5XQAHPZQd8Gy3SXmQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On 2021-Feb-16, Craig Ringer wrote:

> FWIW I'm also thinking of revising the docs to mostly use the term
> "pipeline" instead of "batch". Use "pipelining and batching" in the chapter
> topic, and mention "batch" in the index, and add a para that explains how
> to run batches on top of pipelining, but otherwise use the term "pipeline"
> not "batch".

Hmm, this is a good point.  It means I have a lot of API renaming to do.
I'll get on it now and come back with a proposal.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera       Valdivia, Chile