Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 20:02:39 -0300
From: 'Alvaro Herrera' <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: "k.jamison@fujitsu.com" <k.jamison@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>,
	Matthieu Garrigues <matthieu.garrigues@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Message-ID: <20210308230239.GA2203@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20210304015108.GA15670@alvherre.pgsql>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210308230239.GA2203%40alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

On 2021-Mar-03, 'Alvaro Herrera' wrote:

> I wonder if it would make sense to get rid of conn->last_query
> completely and just rely always on conn->cmd_queue_head, where the
> normal (non-pipeline) would use the first entry of the command queue.
> That might end up being simpler than pipeline mode "pretending" to take
> over ->last_query.

I experimented with this today and it appears to be a good change,
though I haven't been able to make everything work correctly yet.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera       Valdivia, Chile
"Entristecido, Wutra                     (canción de Las Barreras)
echa a Freyr a rodar
y a nosotros al mar"