Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:51:06 -0400
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>,
	Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
	Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
	torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>,
	Atsushi Torikoshi <atorik@gmail.com>,
	Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>,
	Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
	Evgeny Efimkin <efimkin@yandex-team.ru>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for
 pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Message-ID: <20210408165106.GA8261@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20210408153425.GC2439@momjian.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210408165106.GA8261%40alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

On 2021-Apr-08, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> pg_stat_activity.queryid is new, but I can imagine cases where you would
> join pg_stat_activity to pg_stat_statements to get an estimate of how
> long the query will take --- having one using an underscore and another
> one not seems odd.

OK.  So far, you have one vote for queryid (your own) and two votes for
query_id (mine and Julien's).  And even yourself were hesitating about
it earlier in the thread.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera       Valdivia, Chile