Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 16:15:05 -0500
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
Message-ID: <20210418211505.GA7256@telsasoft.com>
References: <1c11f1eb-f00c-43b7-799d-2d44132c02d7@2ndquadrant.com>
 <CA+TgmoZ-FXU0iyevFETN0sGYw0RKTSCFxKONGE+2nVJEM5_8OQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <493812.1593541480@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <494838.1593543098@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20210418185546.GC1500781@rfd.leadboat.com>
 <92408.1618772924@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <92408.1618772924@sss.pgh.pa.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210418211505.GA7256%40telsasoft.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 03:08:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> > Should we be okay releasing v14 without support for breaking function
> > dependency loops, or does that call for an open item?
> 
> Oh!  That should definitely be an open item.  It doesn't seem
> that hard to do something similar to what we do for views,
> i.e. create a dummy function and replace it later.

I added
https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=PostgreSQL_14_Open_Items&type=revision&diff=35926&oldid=35925