Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:23:26 -0500
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
	pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories
Message-ID: <20210423182326.GK7256@telsasoft.com>
References: <20210403154336.GG29125@momjian.us>
 <20210404012546.GK6592@telsasoft.com>
 <YG+y/eJErKPDUhiS@paquier.xyz>
 <20210409031718.GO6592@telsasoft.com>
 <20210409113928.GA12919@momjian.us>
 <YHPUHdXuCzMIROf9@paquier.xyz>
 <2746080.1618206052@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <YHVJfw2YN5/oGAcQ@paquier.xyz>
 <20210413123139.GE6091@telsasoft.com>
 <YHaSUbjPeh1XesoJ@paquier.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YHaSUbjPeh1XesoJ@paquier.xyz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210423182326.GK7256%40telsasoft.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:57:21PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 07:31:39AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Good point.
> 
> Thanks.  I have used the wording that Tom has proposed upthread, added
> one GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE that you forgot, and applied the
> force_parallel_mode patch.

Thanks.  It just occured to me to ask if we should backpatch it.
The goal is to avoid someone trying to use this as a peformance option.

It's to their benefit and ours if they don't do that on v10-13 for the next 5
years, not just v14-17.

The patch seems to apply cleanly on v12 but cherry-pick needs help for other
branches...

-- 
Justin