Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:57:35 -0500
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
	pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories
Message-ID: <20210424025734.GP7256@telsasoft.com>
References: <YG+y/eJErKPDUhiS@paquier.xyz>
 <20210409031718.GO6592@telsasoft.com>
 <20210409113928.GA12919@momjian.us>
 <YHPUHdXuCzMIROf9@paquier.xyz>
 <2746080.1618206052@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <YHVJfw2YN5/oGAcQ@paquier.xyz>
 <20210413123139.GE6091@telsasoft.com>
 <YHaSUbjPeh1XesoJ@paquier.xyz>
 <20210423182326.GK7256@telsasoft.com>
 <YIN5XQgI4YhPyKLh@paquier.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YIN5XQgI4YhPyKLh@paquier.xyz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210424025734.GP7256%40telsasoft.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 10:50:21AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 01:23:26PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > The patch seems to apply cleanly on v12 but cherry-pick needs help for other
> > branches...
> 
> FWIW, this did not seem bad enough to me to require a back-patch.
> This parameter got introduced in 2016 and this was the only report
> related to it for the last 5 years.

No, it's not the first report - although I'm surprised I wasn't able to find
more than these.

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190102164525.GU25379@telsasoft.com
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKJS1f_Qi0iboCos3wu6QiAbdF-9FoK57wxzKbe2-WcesN4rFA%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
Justin