Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m1b73-0000Di-Pr for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 20:59:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m1b72-0003dW-NN for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 20:59:12 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m1b71-0003bD-Q4 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 20:59:12 +0000 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m1b6y-0001Ux-Rb for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 20:59:10 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02F25C0175; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:59:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Jul 2021 16:59:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; bh=6PneRTRpE1+2j06Fmlt1StufdWf0oQPUA1pOA+t8+Ns=; b=jukUSocC A70ZSxrpgaYsUc4yOkRcRfEjdOdYczRV4GWcAi+bEg1qHGTd8/S3edW/u0F5LZZg M8GGnyW9gam4goH/NJ0qrTUDSrrCVFZWHI62d1iSf5q0AZZNTZN5h+XuiNUdKyYN uAk2twdm7eYYt6wNoN1vkJKQlOfuyiQPgwtN/EloCofItMx8I+MkmeZWfCfPPbIM K8EnHGdYH+kaNm9IRcjRt6z7vYSrWwtZJGDI6hsKdZ78tiPFzdrCzbNTn4yaLshZ A8HXf5tdXwj6R5jofH6X0sCvTqoDcehUkHI6pQonivHgyf+NYGf0fR+YCbIJsMAR yW/kIbfv09e/dw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrtdeggdduhedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhvrghr ohcujfgvrhhrvghrrgcuoegrlhhvhhgvrhhrvgesrghlvhhhrdhnohdqihhprdhorhhgqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedujeevjeffjeevuddutedvkeeiueeitddvieelfeekveej udefgeeuvdejhfeuleenucffohhmrghinhepvghnthgvrhhprhhishgvuggsrdgtohhmne cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlvhhh vghrrhgvsegrlhhvhhdrnhhoqdhiphdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:59:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D21402A0999; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:59:03 -0400 (-04) Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:59:03 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Tom Lane Cc: Robert Haas , Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: "debug_invalidate_system_caches_always" is too long Message-ID: <202107082059.noychl32d5mv@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2042257.1625776495@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 2021-Jul-08, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 11:17 AM Tom Lane wrote: > >> Fair point. What do you think of the alternative proposals > >> "debug_flush_caches", "debug_discard_caches", etc? > > > I like debug_discard_caches best. > > I can live with that. Anyone strongly against it? Seems fine to me. -- Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Just treat us the way you want to be treated + some extra allowance for ignorance." (Michael Brusser)