Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLZpP-0004hE-LS for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 23:39:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLZpM-0008FW-4D for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 23:39:32 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLZpL-0008D8-OE for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 23:39:31 +0000 Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLZpE-0002WK-Lr for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 23:39:30 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id m21so119386qkm.13 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:39:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=systemguards-com-ec.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=nYtE5NojmwGhy7+S8bk/5fGfw/bZKEdasBnQ6L1+NT4=; b=xdH9qGSWmzsSh8ZOB68d4yxxAoAmnW9UeY/X5FGtRWYkuzUHe2/krRMirQjpm8L2g6 VQYAJc0UbjMdzNiHDkEzRnrKhAPGrB77gH/t017VBcASYTBFj9swDZqLg6QUADSt+07g d2Vq/s0BilUr8XQboJ3O4uF+g+f0mtaVEzrO8Y8j3NRRvyqPrS61HAK4ea0AJ5pz4mGn 6Z+wdywyeV5fX8M4QuEcyrD5dIc8TkOJrcMScWw+mLDNCzXTcvmnMzf+XKzRd9TWLWvi PA7XT5Fdco/s/BWGPGcs/XbSzWOAws8IYzWbcVT/ncB0BbBEM2lJprFdFSEWjdzEtReg qEuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=nYtE5NojmwGhy7+S8bk/5fGfw/bZKEdasBnQ6L1+NT4=; b=FMinA4DKTiFt401+/k+x3aNm+iPCvcKGCwC1U7p87AdKEdxSY/e5enlCfSyIupyQiO OeChooDSXBpHHDEZhlRqAH34DkzEb0/RaljWMwN9hp35EikJ0YsCH7cyFTKQyCKZMSvU WSWI7+03EHknMIaarvc6VRYXptpfnlprNdhaeHyc4G1/eeIU1hqh8or5CVXBMB4ZvQWc YGf7RqRzORCHq05vCQVSXWo8usFHjyhY9QKIp9Srb3a97HohipRoxJxN8NgtGoEAIPqt YiGA68JO+OjFl1POr5UUgSg5FGdx85UxqRQwPkGf9KJMvvwInhG8Uukq6ChaI8EAKhfx YEOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532L+SogRzmnuif5kPrfcIgggMMHvg0Hvhm2Aj+gjXpQ1LCdPf26 0f/SU4Er0mnvDYxokWEo0T55HQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4ywgPmRl7pbVgcVE5QvlSPQBYnPtMYOy5BprStdOQK4NfeoicBMBKZvWX8Hc3063thCjZvQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1525:: with SMTP id n5mr506488qkk.386.1630539562939; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ahch-to ([201.183.4.120]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d68sm170442qke.19.2021.09.01.16.39.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 18:39:17 -0500 From: Jaime Casanova To: Dean Rasheed Cc: Tom Lane , Yugo NAGATA , PostgreSQL Hackers , Dave Page Subject: Re: Numeric x^y for negative x Message-ID: <20210901233917.GA10373@ahch-to> References: <2394813.1628179479@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2449471.1628218684@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2492411.1628266518@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2557151.1628281566@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:27:03PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote: > On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 21:26, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > Dean Rasheed writes: > > > On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 17:15, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Looks plausible by eyeball (I've not tested). > > > > > So, I have back-branch patches for this ready to go. The question is, > > > is it better to push now, or wait until after next week's releases? > > > > I'd push now, given we have a failing buildfarm member. > > > > Admittedly, there may be nobody else using that compiler out in > > the real world, but we don't know that. > > > > OK. Will do. > Hi Dean, It seems you already committed this. But it's still as "Ready for committer" in the commitfest app. Are we waiting for something else or we can mark it as committed? -- Jaime Casanova Director de Servicios Profesionales SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL