Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:46:53 -0300
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
	"Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>,
	Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>,
	"masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com" <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>,
	"pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
	"mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com" <mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com>,
	"Jakub.Wartak@tomtom.com" <Jakub.Wartak@tomtom.com>,
	Ryo Matsumura <matsumura.ryo@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: prevent immature WAL streaming
Message-ID: <202110132046.mqsx3t6jdpgh@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20211013203655.7pqm2bgbljjrkdgn@alap3.anarazel.de>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202110132046.mqsx3t6jdpgh%40alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

Hi

On 2021-Oct-13, Andres Freund wrote:

> Something very roughly like the attached. Perhaps that's going a bit overboard
> though. But it seems like it might be something we could use in a few tests?

Hah, our emails crossed.  If you want to turn this into a patch to the
026 test file, please go ahead.  Failing that, I'd just push the patch I
just sent in my other reply.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"You're _really_ hosed if the person doing the hiring doesn't understand
relational systems: you end up with a whole raft of programmers, none of
whom has had a Date with the clue stick."              (Andrew Sullivan)