Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mf2mh-0007cU-Cf for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:25:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mf2mf-0004zh-Lw for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:25:13 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mf2me-0004zX-QA for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:25:13 +0000 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mf2mb-0001Xc-1A for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:25:11 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA545C0213; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:25:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:25:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=SCABQbiLoNn+i0rXGiNVl0DqLGXH4fiQXs6qxVnVz9Q=; b=PCyWKvTp eiyjbGZ3ECNPED+6E2isiraM3JBHb3A1ZgtiO3pCr7WcKdYV6pa3+rUiXk+vqYWf +8oZGetf2jzYa6Kd55f+I1eTLjQks+BKQ8Cu5Uljo+9khHxPgIjKOp6KYHgl4ywK zv6+fUKm9EJ8FWbPNYhfQzz34CG1hz32nnBe0asZv23gQbuT/O+ifhrqoN+hefPu qc6NNihg6Xlyb1xfxhDsWiI0rb4uQBOEuSnSuB5/e6IxLFxFrczj3g8b+7UutZJY weT1F2eexMZ1yxO/jYByHe7OSpres1mZmcYSf2HgqzN5kFRH2zAK6Hk+xRekN2kB vF7cJgWvJ5DM8g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdefhedgleejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhvrghr ohcujfgvrhhrvghrrgcuoegrlhhvhhgvrhhrvgesrghlvhhhrdhnohdqihhprdhorhhgqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeluddvhfehtefhiedugeejieetuedugefgveevvddvhfdv keegteefgeefhfekvdenucffohhmrghinhepphhoshhtghhrvghsqhhlrdhlihhfvgdpvg hnthgvrhhprhhishgvuggsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlvhhhvghrrhgvsegrlhhvhhdrnhhoqdhiphdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:25:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3C10A2A0745; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:25:04 -0300 (-03) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:25:04 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Tom Lane Cc: Robert Haas , Andrew Dunstan , PostgreSQL Hackers , Andres Freund Subject: Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions Message-ID: <202110251625.hfkjnskkoy5t@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3977619.1635175997@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 2021-Oct-25, Tom Lane wrote: > It's also unclear to me why we'd leave Windows out of this discussion. > We keep saying we want to encourage Windows-based hackers to contribute, > so doesn't that require testing it on the same basis as other platforms? Testing of in-support branches, sure -- I don't propose to break that. But this is all about providing *some* server against which to test client-side changes with, right? Not to test the old servers themselves. Looking at Amit K's "Postgres person of the week" interview[1] and remembering conversations with David Rowley, Windows hackers seem perfectly familiar with getting Linux builds going, so we wouldn't need to force MSVC fixes in order for them to have old servers available. But anyway, I was thinking that the fixes required for MSVC buildability were quite invasive, but on looking again they don't seem all that bad[2], so I withdraw that comment. I do think you have moved the goalposts: to reiterate what I said above, I thought what we wanted was to have *some* server in order to test client-side changes with; not to be able to get a server running on every possible platform. I'm not really on board with the idea that old branches have to be buildable everywhere all the time. [1] https://postgresql.life/post/amit_kapila/ [2] e.g., commit 2b1394fc2b52a2573d08aa626e7b49568f27464e -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/