Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 22:08:07 -0600
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>,
	Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
	Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
	Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
	pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions
Message-ID: <20211216040807.GY17618@telsasoft.com>
References: <d0316012-ece7-7b7e-2d36-9c38cb77cb3b@enterprisedb.com>
 <20211202221607.xovsdnoh5tpbnhbs@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <196b40be-c571-e77f-3335-920f8a00047f@enterprisedb.com>
 <2316211.1638556231@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+Tgmob0V3dJ57vKL1iouk1oLMFn-60eAUQ+ab6=1BDG7ZC8iw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2978297.1638751274@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <3794414.1639072240@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <6f92dea3-9619-be68-239f-8990a832b453@dunslane.net>
 <70194.1639290264@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <556122.1639520324@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <556122.1639520324@sss.pgh.pa.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20211216040807.GY17618%40telsasoft.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:18:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Anyway, it seems like there's some consensus that 9.2 is a good
> > stopping place for today.  I'll push forward with
> > (1) back-patching as necessary to make 9.2 and up build cleanly
> > on the platforms I have handy;
> > (2) ripping out pg_dump's support for pre-9.2 servers;
> > (3) ripping out psql's support for pre-9.2 servers.
> 
> I've completed the pg_dump/pg_dumpall part of that, but while

Is it possible to clean up pg_upgrade, too ?

-- 
Justin