Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxyFD-0007xz-1s for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:24:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxyFB-0006BM-Tt for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:24:53 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxyFB-0006BD-Ke for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:24:53 +0000 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxyF8-0008BI-UI for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:24:52 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A13D3201D0A; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:24:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:24:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=KJaxZRWBDYHVkQnqFyiEkR9RGKjec7/LLD/zG1/gJNw=; b=d/aXm06d mogKr1hpJLqGm2fOxd0NiArM7KDul55UqNH9Em8m8RmI+G9eye6O2eXucRVi+bi1 dt8ZMOQ+vvbKyP634eEvimWkqCvMj1sqbLNodWllkgpqb8kGnVH+qoDtMN5PxUdd 1sQ62ktyEZR6/07PeRU80NaKGpD1Pj+RvF0/LOj7eT0bZz2Hg0JH4u0CeQ0TzAOF i2oIkzRDyBGR5YFT7PP4tr6EK46hQIe1zJgnhc3iQ+plnHFNJmHEGuY+CJWjAcmf bVTQPnYJ9dT9nLTQpGkxFP1LJx93ItMWxs62olRM+qrTnvbqRIJueEOvzaVMNTCG pXKKEPk8duYhqQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrleeggdduheduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhvrghr ohcujfgvrhhrvghrrgcuoegrlhhvhhgvrhhrvgesrghlvhhhrdhnohdqihhprdhorhhgqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedujeevjeffjeevuddutedvkeeiueeitddvieelfeekveej udefgeeuvdejhfeuleenucffohhmrghinhepvghnthgvrhhprhhishgvuggsrdgtohhmne cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlvhhh vghrrhgvsegrlhhvhhdrnhhoqdhiphdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:24:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 249412A07D0; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:24:44 -0300 (-03) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:24:44 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Melanie Plageman Cc: Andres Freund , Justin Pryzby , Kyotaro Horiguchi , Magnus Hagander , Pg Hackers , Lukas Fittl , Thomas Munro Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) Message-ID: <202112162124.m2sgkdxnuuty@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 2021-Dec-15, Melanie Plageman wrote: > I noticed after changing the docs on the "bgwriter" target for > pg_stat_reset_shared to say "checkpointer", that it still said "bgwriter" in > src/backend/po/ko.po > src/backend/po/it.po > ... > I presume these are automatically updated with some incantation, but I wasn't > sure what it was nor could I find documentation on this. Yes, feel free to ignore those files completely. They are updated using an external workflow that you don't need to concern yourself with. -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "World domination is proceeding according to plan" (Andrew Morton)