Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n9fv7-0005af-PW for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 04:16:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n9fv6-0002UI-KW for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 04:16:32 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n9fv6-0002U9-BB for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 04:16:32 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n9fv3-00021t-PM for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 04:16:32 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id p125so1577593pga.2 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 20:16:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=6OD8NbD8iQmxMQm+RcM3YLBg525iGwLIsvKWU8lhRaQ=; b=ZzmO5GmxLDfa0iCyC83mCzqoF8M4P1aXkXCqDeDC3IJFbW1/RyauPlEVSEDVp1seZT /z81lrZ/zlH4NRIPEyVkyqbPbw/fBpFVxERFcYvqMmkSVYBJq4HSkomfPE0mILjNZFGN GKBEaOjzUAb+SB6eumVpZXuskkvLPCTXaUg40xGfeDg53dQVKdSRumutDgHfEZFUzpEf loq7GCI01JNP1y8wbzjEek9vujn0Pa1cnrE0PIpU6kI9uWxINBXpPWC94hu8SyNtXmk0 Rc+TqChIi/MYj1b9EicoN3/E8VoS0uErr/8P9NLBTSZP3uUfGirUpsgFN11DGUdXRoqw h+lA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=6OD8NbD8iQmxMQm+RcM3YLBg525iGwLIsvKWU8lhRaQ=; b=XEWTUXRqoN7r1txyoXl21gBwAph4spGa7GQ9IjawMTcAphVUlynszn8nAMTOqEis/m Nase4I1ZLj0myAI1vJHw8g9BHefAi/yYDz6OiVZJKkThE4W/3n6EZdGLJgcvS6OIteYm pEF1dcuOvzsWHynpgldQP76DTaMqsjyKTOB559TIUfP+B4lDtITJ9wlK8LuPiFaQVT96 9H827Ba7tXRKCVUvGOHYqdo7kXDi2n6zaZod8430csApGe1fRpgLlS60Iq/qh5pTqrvd KAOYTrhVa2372iJLgX2aDdnMhUIIUnFZ0C3Nu4uIHppaC5VXwBHvRtg/O5myuzS5gqYf ugdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530n4KzdEqRH6uMnQ2weBcrJYPbIlEixr8UOuBExdxObrJ8pJGSu Im+P4+CnuwhTmZxS+9A0+CQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyp9JPpk8RwONGL6X4ak3tva6TPSpkC5J7FIECy3GFJkcnkmMUnfONW+d588/8xldCZ4DuCHw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:4f0c:: with SMTP id d12mr9413326pgb.133.1642479387706; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 20:16:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from jrouhaud (1-171-184-213.dynamic-ip.hinet.net. [1.171.184.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r14sm765152pjo.39.2022.01.17.20.16.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Jan 2022 20:16:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:16:23 +0800 From: Julien Rouhaud To: Amit Langote Cc: Alvaro Herrera , Andrew Dunstan , Ibrar Ahmed , Arne Roland , "David G. Johnston" , Masahiko Sawada , Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL-development , Rahila Syed , Tomas Vondra Subject: Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?) Message-ID: <20220118041623.ffxy2gphluossyk5@jrouhaud> References: <202201111123.2jgx5lnzecdf@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Hi, On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 08:40:54PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > > Okay, I created versions of the patch series for branches 13 and 14 > (.txt files). The one for HEAD is also re-attached. FYI The patch failed today on FreeBSD, while it was previously quite stable on all platforms (https://cirrus-ci.com/build/4551468081479680), with this error: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6360787076775936/regress_diffs/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/regression.diffs diff -U3 /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/../regress/expected/reloptions.out /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/results/reloptions.out --- /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/../regress/expected/reloptions.out 2022-01-18 00:12:52.533086000 +0000 +++ /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/results/reloptions.out 2022-01-18 00:28:00.000524000 +0000 @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ SELECT pg_relation_size('reloptions_test') = 0; ?column? ---------- - t + f (1 row) I'm not sure why this test failed as it doesn't seem like something impacted by the patch, but I may have missed something as I only had a quick look at the patch and discussion.