Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nC6tT-0000Kp-Im for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 21:28:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nC6sw-0003hm-AT for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 21:28:22 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nC6sw-0003hd-1S for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 21:28:22 +0000 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nC6sp-0001oo-P2 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 21:28:21 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEB15C01F6; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:28:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:28:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anarazel.de; h= cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; bh=J3OuUvasSu+SOpGPx/X8xwbnisELiDu8WOUAdl VcCWA=; b=pfdjCo8498WsxyWn1b4Y07hu5G1eVWRgSNVJWoyrH1s5mVDbZPMkLl s9Z2aFaYEzODA/7BookPdU+nA3aYkL07pia3M/SfCNtTvhjcpwQcjXTOukeObvJg lkgWqBt1LZ9eMuhJZrKgwg6B62ySbGoqqKKwna65hLVlbxpjfEcecZFNr5pO++wu 1x58XPx189sSCuS1+cdkvDvKWv06X3DVCny9yJnBAY5x1n951unFRGYhJGWUymHi qKtdFbwO2owe2X+6docB2HXjGv3SHcIOOEsjHv9Hnccyyf3AXoMwx4mtIJxLXYaE NYxxZm+hc+Z+kKYvDwSqDVIrfOLKoMjw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=J3OuUvasSu+SOpGPx /X8xwbnisELiDu8WOUAdlVcCWA=; b=oDkoLuTloun47Vkw+50dY1ANUS1PIYNWW 7sKvF0xnTAPGIcThLEZHudgN3n9CEYauIObR+HWHf77F54ldPvqrt6FYONEVs8FH o2wHxxYR9OSK9cBTL5oa0mcO1j6aJFPJOn05z06qSjF4n9ADl0UG1ZZ++8rKPZH7 pawSMSqByjc7qVz2LMUdQC3VknegN+OsVNLhDfc71ajUZFRABlIMItHNCxxgnv1Y TqyLjtOnFCxcmtzjVx7TCmmtuuFoKPxsIjWDdlggQqk0kV/D1XAxIU7bz7VYIMX+ Gv+s92tyehlLLrw2H74HC8C0zRctJWFqduL9OSK4m/n/pVulgQiPg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrvdejgdduiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomheptehnughrvghs ucfhrhgvuhhnugcuoegrnhgurhgvshesrghnrghrrgiivghlrdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepudekhfekleeugeevteehleffffejgeelueduleeffeeutdelffeujeffhfeu ffdunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprg hnughrvghssegrnhgrrhgriigvlhdruggv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:28:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:28:13 -0800 From: Andres Freund To: Tom Lane , Thomas Munro Cc: Alexander Lakhin , Andrew Dunstan , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky? Message-ID: <20220124212813.hufy7f3ubnzzbk7c@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <2763901.1641932210@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20220114202848.x2ctpjgyreqx22dv@alap3.anarazel.de> <3430789.1642200712@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20220124200222.gaxd6e33t2b2fqni@alap3.anarazel.de> <2138894.1643056525@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2138894.1643056525@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Hi, On 2022-01-24 15:35:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund writes: > > On 2022-01-14 17:51:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> FWIW, I'm just fine with reverting, particularly in the back branches. > >> It seems clear that this dank corner of Windows contains even more > >> creepy-crawlies than we thought. > > > Seems we should revert now-ish? There's a minor release coming up and I think > > it'd be bad to ship these changes to users. > > Sure. Do we want to revert in HEAD too? Not sure. I'm also OK with trying to go with Thomas' patch to walreceiver and try a bit longer to get all this working. Thomas? Greetings, Andres Freund