public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Yugo NAGATA <[email protected]>
To: Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: 'Zhihong Yu' <[email protected]>
Cc: vignesh C <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Fan <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 01:25:48 +0900
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113102342.mlhknuy6ppypflq3@jrouhaud>
References: <[email protected]>
<CALDaNm2UoQ64B-GW0q4U_5RURddKSmsJMjDv2f-uM6c4+QakSw@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CALNJ-vTaGk4AvjrCPPkW_GyWQ+KeW_dFA=hakcxfy=rGF28TWQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CALNJ-vRSVtqZDXU6-DjdycFkjonxKs2TbBFb=W=W9Y7KG0rRwA@mail.gmail.com>
<OS0PR01MB56829A65926C0FF7CF00F5EB82D29@OS0PR01MB5682.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<OS0PR01MB5682B499319EBEB59F416AD582619@OS0PR01MB5682.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<20220113102342.mlhknuy6ppypflq3@jrouhaud>
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:23:42 +0800
Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 04:37:10PM +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 04:31:25 +0000
> > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I checked the same procedure on v24 patch.
> > > But following error occurs instead of the original error.
> > >
> > > ERROR: relation "ivm_t_index" already exists
> >
> > Thank you for pointing out it!
> >
> > Hmmm, an index is created when IMMV is defined, so CREAE INDEX called
> > after this would fail... Maybe, we should not create any index automatically
> > if IMMV is created WITH NO DATA.
> >
> > I'll fix it after some investigation.
>
> Are you still investigating on that problem? Also, the patchset doesn't apply
> anymore:
I attached the updated and rebased patch set.
I fixed to not create a unique index when an IMMV is created WITH NO DATA.
Instead, the index is created by REFRESH WITH DATA only when the same one
is not created yet.
Also, I fixed the documentation to describe that foreign tables and partitioned
tables are not supported according with Takahashi-san's suggestion.
> There isn't any answer to your following email summarizing the feature yet, so
> I'm not sure what should be the status of this patch, as there's no ideal
> category for that. For now I'll change the patch to Waiting on Author on the
> cf app, feel free to switch it back to Needs Review if you think it's more
> suitable, at least for the design discussion need.
I changed the status to Needs Review.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo NAGATA <[email protected]>
view thread (3+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox