Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nPnZH-0003sv-La for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:40:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nPnZG-0007ZE-9n for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:40:38 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nPnZF-0007Z4-UV for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:40:37 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nPnZ9-0004Vg-HQ for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:40:36 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id t187so574657pgb.1 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 07:40:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ywyt93PXm8C7dh+yViaEQV0UQkId2+wXKD6jIdGs9q0=; b=F/yHNIZDw1jOz3ITRX8gabPYoqC6yp4IHTQ3zYclFk7hxu4f595ukzGiVY7NmZXmtK f3jxq0kHk2qqB9AefpIoKsLR7LXjCjZWGgX8Hm5pBzLZwmFb0a0tmGSyCeRhaMwRY2m8 GRpB3yFvkb/nx82wNMe8zsccs7EHEFf0uusocWMz0gg6RbNWZVyTHolxuecOBBZ7tn7/ fTyZ0eVFU6U5KeuHRcM+PEhgkuVZTAahE2bWtJ2w37bg4rO16xU8r62vps2e8ZnzvB+6 mJAVDz/ALpprzyXdhajfkBzFvykUI56osSs8H25i/Nji8YvcKmb/+CmvnregHZAxkj+q azag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ywyt93PXm8C7dh+yViaEQV0UQkId2+wXKD6jIdGs9q0=; b=bs3JXA3OIZYToRZbUuDvTQ/+uea38xZXdqILdx8bnhDg1krVmugKTcds8mnzEKhQmK pu8+XAaDcykPTTRhogQpQ+/aOI2Z932zVS7xCNEd0bA5Yk70mbt9qRvpWpcGkIuniJxC /iQfwwF0XXEa2RR+T/vnO4hbXiDNmrCB2VJhDz4kCAuLHX8rVzII+6tGgrfQkWPZ9cI7 JTRwmLByJpQmcQGetGPSYt8M59MwSqQjDg18NzG3+XxhRDxsOxS8+aBh9bb+qs4U0O2Q V7E5eCpYtLJHo+koePa24FD2ka0vwrvV7VR2Q7WGDoOT0gP6EZm7MogDggKt6Bg+W9MF TwzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IFZIzGyTL1n3S/D9UbejaiAgQSuqB9cWXVqCT0FFtURBTLQrC XGPSiEVjimjHm6wGK7aSzWE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzyhnN+rAW5n+lb1hijjAESgdpMZOoDw6Ple7wnSjXiJybWp4zfBOElTnxKojxvxlkNYtdgw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2c53:0:b0:373:7234:adf2 with SMTP id s80-20020a632c53000000b003737234adf2mr30421968pgs.111.1646322030330; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 07:40:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from jrouhaud (2001-b011-1005-3127-25f1-7473-0faa-af8a.dynamic-ip6.hinet.net. [2001:b011:1005:3127:25f1:7473:faa:af8a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q13-20020aa7982d000000b004cb98a2ca35sm3271459pfl.211.2022.03.03.07.40.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Mar 2022 07:40:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 23:40:26 +0800 From: Julien Rouhaud To: Tom Lane Cc: Pavel Borisov , Dave Page , Postgres hackers Subject: Re: Problem with moderation of messages with patched attached. Message-ID: <20220303154026.idykywotrt7l36um@jrouhaud> References: <3160304.1646320626@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3160304.1646320626@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 10:17:06AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Pavel Borisov writes: > >> The mail system doesn't have the capability to apply different moderation > >> rules for people in that way I'm afraid. > > > Maybe then 2MB for everyone? > > Maybe your patch needs to be split up? You're going to have a hard time > finding people who want to review or commit such large chunks. I think it's the total attachment size, not a single file. So while splitting up the patchset even more would still be a good idea, compressing the files before sending them to hundred of people would be an even better one.