Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nPpUu-0000rB-Fe for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 17:44:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nPpUt-0001Ii-7U for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 17:44:15 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nPpUs-0001IW-U6 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 17:44:14 +0000 Received: from tamriel.snowman.net ([70.109.60.50]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nPpUq-0007wU-V9 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 17:44:14 +0000 Received: by tamriel.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 613595F798; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:44:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:44:12 -0500 From: Stephen Frost To: Pavel Borisov Cc: Dave Page , Postgres hackers Subject: Re: Problem with moderation of messages with patched attached. Message-ID: <20220303174412.GN10577@tamriel.snowman.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nTz/38/ObklNZF0h" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --nTz/38/ObklNZF0h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Greetings, * Pavel Borisov (pashkin.elfe@gmail.com) wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 13:28, Pavel Borisov wrote: > >> The mail system doesn't have the capability to apply different moderation > >>> rules for people in that way I'm afraid. > >>> > >> Maybe then 2MB for everyone? Otherwise it's not so convenient. Lead to > >> answers before the questions in the thread [1], seems weird. > > > > Then someone will complain if their patch is 2.1MB! How often are messages > > legitimately over 1MB anyway, even with a patch? I don't usually moderate > > -hackers, so I don't know if this is a common thing or not. I do pay attention to -hackers and no, it doesn't come up very often. > Authors in the mentioned thread [1] bump into this issue while posting all > 11 versions of a patchset. It is little bit more than 1MB. We can try to > use .gz and if this doesn't work we report it again. This patch set really shoudl be broken down into smaller independent pieces that attack different parts and not be all one big series of patches. Thanks, Stephen --nTz/38/ObklNZF0h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJiIP5rAAoJEO1sijiDR2RVlUQP/REb+SghP64JUkyjYUpV1YlI 4A25vXTZM5PB4bvff3+864zRbhSZhNG5tAeXs2paUQvPsfkKE5i76Opp95NxMRmN 6YpcNx5yIrJ6nEELckGsnyuDMwcSIDqy+NgzQ8ZYD98lZh5UMYcN4QhMx5EcZwGt JI0XAy4EFWxhRjoHTaE/RUQdVTy+Fg0pLDU4q1gO4ABxq7Ano8mEADgea8oypb80 VRSvm+rHPTkTwSlbg5RJzbvJhjeucqs30YtKj44zuDXAj/p0SJESdfrPFvt8jXOC Jy6+oGS+7KTYVMu2AQ9ZsKigF2ocwvUB3qZH9UuRgLF47Kr6Mi4UtP1WeedquaJv LftiJWnyA6ixsGt4Q+st7cpRYaEu2FxZhb1aHDV92OQ7VQ5MNL9osq4of4+kOCFC isuu76JeVK2qrJw9eu+Qo9654l12s+KT3rhXU9C/YeI5js4OblJN6zCydnbfmO5q PcwxbDDDmSFgSS4B/Tu35tL8zU6uJr+eGRbbJIg9Uc7GitJPnPc13XlHuqvLUoTS DohP0os8AeyVF5wjjEgscRSvMQc8mZYh/MyZx97vpY0i5V5270I6nGisvP7AMkWR c2+gjT4nQ12fOMsBEppRMCFqsD9Hzazq65VBkce1yYk6KI/eo85Flyc0jNcg0bb1 rnOKTvLwu8jv5CHwsv37 =AfnN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nTz/38/ObklNZF0h--