Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 19:35:23 -0700
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
	Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, deniel1495@mail.ru,
	Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>, tejeswarm@hotmail.com,
	hlinnaka <hlinnaka@iki.fi>,
	Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>,
	"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	Daniel Wood <hexexpert@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Corruption during WAL replay
Message-ID: <20220325023523.qege22k7mxddq3st@alap3.anarazel.de>
References: <20220318.102109.162855329039722212.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoYqgB8NjTgw6pZsA-RVo4qF8i9CPfqK07sjs6DLGCDf6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <3152696.1648159485@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoYG4-P8PUWPVZyCjR0_kUwfY0KFRJcO7WGO2fi7icGTpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoYhFvsNedWw9eRJXPevy-RytpRMofbyETtU1SxUCG16-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <3167047.1648169107@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+Tgmoa_TAJsUnFWzTevg=FzgXFyiHLJAY_L-jMDA=mH=ytysg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3170060.1648171358@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20220325021402.r22saxtwuqu3bbil@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <CA+hUKG+M4V287f-kSmg3d_t7MKFwhTkKrfhxxqb8hNKLcfKZhQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+hUKG+M4V287f-kSmg3d_t7MKFwhTkKrfhxxqb8hNKLcfKZhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220325023523.qege22k7mxddq3st%40alap3.anarazel.de>
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 2022-03-25 15:23:24 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> One random thing I've noticed about serinus is that it seems to drop
> UDP packets more than others, but dragonet apparently doesn't:

Serinus is built with optimization. Which I guess could lead to other backends
reporting stats more quickly? And of course could lead to running more often
(due to finishing before the next cron invocation). I think I've also
configured my animals to run more often than many other owners.

So I'm not sure how much can be gleaned from raw "failure counts" without
taking the number of runs into account as well?

- Andres