Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 07:28:15 +0200
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>,
	=?utf-8?B?5p2O5p2wKOaFjui/vSk=?= <adger.lj@alibaba-inc.com>,
	pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org,
	=?utf-8?B?5pu+5paH5peMKOS5ieS7jik=?= <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>,
	Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index
Message-ID: <202204260528.yfc7jqc64eas@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <YmeAV6gG/7Xqhiba@paquier.xyz>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202204260528.yfc7jqc64eas%40alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-Apr-26, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 08:58:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Well, I am a bit annoyed that we don't actually check that a CLUSTER
> > command does not block when doing a CLUSTER on a partitioned table
> > while a lock is held on one of its partitions.  So, attached is a
> > proposal of patch to improve the test coverage in this area.
> 
> This was the last reason why this was listed as an open item, so,
> hearing nothing, I have applied this patch to add those extra tests,
> and switched the item as fixed.

Thank you!

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/