Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oUNHL-0008EX-Va for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 07:09:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oUNHJ-00010E-4V for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 07:09:17 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oUNHI-000105-Pi for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 07:09:16 +0000 Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oUNHC-0003NZ-Am for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 07:09:13 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id 72so3923860pfx.9 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 00:09:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=HMqnQTNkL6yRom4+zI7+HVJ4aItFzS9YfgKuXMoUuLA=; b=jHxBiM4MeaLw7h9skurE7TNkwJad/v4fncF2MPHV3WB9RJcgPcnCKdGbdFyeDoqPRy iYON437/sPaEtAPQWIqedz5PsywRmm9iTupFrOYMx0HTB8MuiJZuZuiGLrxYf+iu0Xee DPvEUa2MCIdzetutnp36hJRvDx0GQHSxVJvlnAHd7BIYux2UKcURTsfHtb3bUX5G9WNf aqfTPP4YVH+NQ3dr+zHkyYsyiq3VsfzhOceWDM5H0vcsrQWx0bxM5szKUmK8MWGKY8Yz doLDuuQk7h3gZVDiS6JZQqsVlAJrMQYCEpmPteYK24RSpAYTrrS1e2LYiMa81ZapHr5y 36qA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=HMqnQTNkL6yRom4+zI7+HVJ4aItFzS9YfgKuXMoUuLA=; b=y8dP23vnkvjqCVfRmezxfloz2Pf83NzNxsirPxa6ptl8kgYLqnK0gWOZ24gRo6SBXd 8mtZftzG5dbemzXECP5MelfllhpZ3q3FwUA3BZVohN3LQCik/woUuwQ0W/VbFslc7DGp adEEfB6wP0dwnqpPJKMsXzsf224s1qDq4Dbl3IHMO5kceneLSthPTpHNwA7/1dwajVlV NK+JZC2iMXkl0ngTYi9CekrZKsonfWYXhT8uIAlx0TfLtLFGHe6aDyjlBItBFuZkpJUZ 76s1ibFaKZh52uJEwj35+fzNwqc+E5EYNaElxMHrNl/H4bSypnhx6AaYXeMe9vcB3bff 0jFg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0fj2jlGWUpYXJt/9na6oi4cTBhRwlH2+pm+pQOuufNx06cjfvf ew1arotpOMx4Y3zQfTCI/1c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR73Q5z3LaalmEsvPzOd+bTGkvkKisHUQbNX/hLVRvCxoQwctSgg8eECSDkOs/C9nP6ad3uIrg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1907:b0:534:f2ef:e8fe with SMTP id y7-20020a056a00190700b00534f2efe8femr39861750pfi.65.1662188948372; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 00:09:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jrouhaud (2001-b011-1006-9a08-1cc8-b11e-9423-fc42.dynamic-ip6.hinet.net. [2001:b011:1006:9a08:1cc8:b11e:9423:fc42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c38-20020a631c26000000b0042a55fb60bbsm2536591pgc.28.2022.09.03.00.09.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Sep 2022 00:09:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 15:09:03 +0800 From: Julien Rouhaud To: Ibrar Ahmed Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi , Fabien COELHO , Daniel Gustafsson , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Yugo NAGATA Subject: Re: pgbench: using prepared BEGIN statement in a pipeline could cause an error Message-ID: <20220903070903.csii5fussti6gxs7@jrouhaud> References: <20210716153013.fc53b1c780b06fccc07a7f0d@sraoss.co.jp> <3461267.1648239594@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20220328123316.9b57d6840c3ff2bd700f5e44@sraoss.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Hi, On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 10:36:37AM +0500, Ibrar Ahmed wrote: > > Hi Kyotaro Horiguchi, Fabien Coelho, Daniel Gustafsson, > > Since you haven't had time to write a review the last many days, the author > replied > with a rebased patch for a long time and never heard. We've taken your name > off the reviewer list for this patch. Of course, you are still welcome to > review it if you can > find the time. We're removing your name so that other reviewers know the > patch still needs > attention. We understand that day jobs and other things get in the way of > doing patch > reviews when you want to, so please come back and review a patch or two > later when you > have more time. I thought that we decided not to remove assigned reviewers from a CF entry, even if they didn't reply recently? See the discussion around https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZSBNhX0zCkG5T5KiQize9Aq4%2Bec%2BuqLcfBhm_%2B12MbQA%40mail.gmail.com