Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 14:07:16 +0200
From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] wrong FK constraint name when colliding name on ATTACH
Message-ID: <20220908140716.0323dedd@karst>
In-Reply-To: <20220908112515.5pe5obtk4a63aiee@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20220908094026.640a0224@karst>
	<20220908112515.5pe5obtk4a63aiee@alvherre.pgsql>
Organization: Dalibo
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220908140716.0323dedd%40karst>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 13:25:15 +0200
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:

> On 2022-Sep-08, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> 
> > Hi there,
> > 
> > I believe this very small bug and its fix are really trivial and could be
> > push out of the way quite quickly. It's just about a bad constraint name
> > fixed by moving one assignation after the next one. This could easily be
> > fixed for next round of releases.
> > 
> > Well, I hope I'm not wrong :)  
> 
> I think you're right, so pushed, and backpatched to 12.  I added the
> test case to regression also.

Great, thank you for the additional work on the regression test and the commit!

> For 11, I adjusted the test case so that it didn't depend on an FK
> pointing to a partitioned table (which is not supported there); it turns
> out that the old code is not smart enough to get into the problem in the
> first place.  [...]
> It seems fair to say that this case, with pg11, is unsupported and
> people should upgrade if they want better behavior.

That works for me.

Thanks!