Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 20:43:14 -0800
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>,
	Pavel Luzanov <p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru>,
	pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: add \dpS to psql
Message-ID: <20221208044314.GD216874@nathanxps13>
References: <20221206193606.GB3078082@nathanxps13>
 <661148f4-c7f1-dec1-2bc8-29f3bd58e242@postgrespro.ru>
 <20221208023929.GB27893@telsasoft.com>
 <20221208041900.GB216874@nathanxps13>
 <39743.1670473532@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <39743.1670473532@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20221208044314.GD216874%40nathanxps13>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 11:25:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The fact that we just doubled the number of available bits doesn't
> mean we should immediately strive to use them up.  Perhaps it'd
> be better to subsume these retail privileges under some generic
> "maintenance action" privilege?

That's fine with me, but I wouldn't be surprised if there's disagreement on
how to group the commands.  I certainly don't want to use up the rest of
the bits right away, but there might not be too many more existing
privileges after these three that deserve them.  Perhaps I should take
inventory and offer a plan for all the remaining privileges.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com