Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:44:11 -0800
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>,
	Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>,
	Pavel Luzanov <p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru>,
	pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: add \dpS to psql
Message-ID: <20221209184411.GB59417@nathanxps13>
References: <661148f4-c7f1-dec1-2bc8-29f3bd58e242@postgrespro.ru>
 <20221208023929.GB27893@telsasoft.com>
 <20221208041900.GB216874@nathanxps13>
 <39743.1670473532@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAMsGm5drUvuH789D98Wo_bZggNhUn1LsBYuheJUbKaBsErtY9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221208050754.GA221222@nathanxps13>
 <45224.1670476523@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20221208171503.GA2113@nathanxps13>
 <Y5K7MxuH7Bi+zU5V@paquier.xyz>
 <20221209184055.GA59417@nathanxps13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20221209184055.GA59417@nathanxps13>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20221209184411.GB59417%40nathanxps13>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 10:40:55AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 01:36:03PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 09:15:03AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>>> The main idea behind this work is breaking out privileges into more
>>> granular pieces.  If I want to create a role that only runs VACUUM on some
>>> tables on the weekend, why ѕhould I have to also give it the ability to
>>> ANALYZE, REFRESH, CLUSTER, and REINDEX?  IMHO we should really let the user
>>> decide what set of privileges makes sense for their use-case.  I'm unsure
>>> the grouping all these privileges together serves much purpose besides
>>> preserving ACL bits.
>> 
>> Hmm.  I'd like to think that we should keep a frugal mind here.  More
>> bits are now available, but it does not strike me as a good idea to
>> force their usage more than necessary, so grouping all these no-quite
>> DDL commands into the same bag does not sound that bad to me.
> 
> Okay, it seems I am outnumbered.  I will work on updating the patch to add
> an ACL_MAINTAIN bit and a pg_maintain_all_tables predefined role.

Any thoughts on $SUBJECT?

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com