Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pDC4F-0005jB-3N for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 22:17:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pDC4C-000736-9z for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 22:17:00 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pDC4A-000729-DY for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 22:17:00 +0000 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pDC46-0004w0-G4 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 22:16:56 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAA35C00EB; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 17:16:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 04 Jan 2023 17:16:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anarazel.de; h= cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1672870612; x=1672957012; bh=OFe+rHCtvh LgFqhSieGgX4XBJi01x47xwhewRe0HRbA=; b=Q6VHXszYiM/TsVEBxB2+YZ0LN1 jryOg9kYx3HwEE0VBeSARiL2JlIe3po1HDjGqGEZB6anP+fKE456SVZg25uc+Vhy iKkTD5F/5vJlU8TK6+0T8NV4kWcafklXGwt/Ws3GxBV5i+Ew1QTByyH5ZGB5eZVE O7izveDaXWhBv//BZeRHF7G0/PVPuPMBeHcIq5DdJV2ECT10E8agY8x59o3o5uaK NX0B5+kd+aoKeQ94wzk8OC1DtMFwDRWB33OSDxQ/WZgJlgArydgfHpAozSdW1VT6 SNO7BAtX5uDG7zT9BZK3ov16oNudOfMgqp/1U17l/UXMLCfwa+pvkV7lZJoA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1672870612; x=1672957012; bh=OFe+rHCtvhLgFqhSieGgX4XBJi01 x47xwhewRe0HRbA=; b=M+NLuPspcSOg/g3XNh1dmQSe0tC9Enqyb2XRe5SuxPr5 BjR1/++sA+OJo+zfWhTBbrsXtWXrVbfb/RWEElDzwcatza50PNtDuLDYZ7G9AY/A RGkHpDY/fI8GvgD+Ry0jFg8TpM3F7SrP7TsZKdAQa4PZLQCCkKX6upsOBUcOfnnk O4xqiMlraw+1DVJEkbW0fE/jKFlEH2uG6xTC+pCG7e2Chy5hJ06zaEGCXORlns+V LMwQ+6XWOWbR7t8XgDJHHSmKXjEHAEdPFDD3e0bQAMBOJkh0cstO0iaz3GtmMM/A DUwMrA+p9txDaIAwX0YEXPKAjdPyerr6yAJy4M+Urw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrjeeigdduheekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomheptehnughr vghsucfhrhgvuhhnugcuoegrnhgurhgvshesrghnrghrrgiivghlrdguvgeqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhepvdfffeevhfetveffgeeiteefhfdtvdffjeevhfeuteegleduheetvedu ieettddunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh eprghnughrvghssegrnhgrrhgriigvlhdruggv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: id4a34324:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 17:16:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 14:16:50 -0800 From: Andres Freund To: Noah Misch Cc: Thomas Munro , Tom Lane , Robert Haas , Michael Paquier , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler? Message-ID: <20230104221650.ig6c5hg3325neb7s@awork3.anarazel.de> References: <20220523001001.aecggmoc5mowevuw@alap3.anarazel.de> <20220622023301.pwgy2tsxcc2ypzao@alap3.anarazel.de> <20220701201423.sic5b77ei3atjbes@alap3.anarazel.de> <20220701231833.vh76xkf3udani3np@alap3.anarazel.de> <2624973.1658877772@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20221229084052.GA1514070@rfd.leadboat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221229084052.GA1514070@rfd.leadboat.com> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Hi, On 2022-12-29 00:40:52 -0800, Noah Misch wrote: > Incidentally, the affected test contains comment "# DROP TABLE containing > block which standby has in a pinned buffer". The standby holds no pin at > that moment; the LOCK TABLE pins system catalog pages, but it drops every > pin it acquires. I guess that comment survived from an earlier version of that test (or another test where it was copied from). I'm inclined to just delete it. Greetings, Andres Freund