public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
To: Alexander Pyhalov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in vacuum behavior
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 17:12:35 -0800
Message-ID: <20230121011235.GA10739@nathanxps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 11:18:08AM +0300, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Is it intended? Why don't we perform vacuum_is_permitted_for_relation()
> check for inheritors in expand_vacuum_rel()?
Since no lock is held on the partition, the calls to functions like
object_ownercheck() and pg_class_aclcheck() in
vacuum_is_permitted_for_relation() will produce cache lookup ERRORs if the
relation is concurrently dropped.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
view thread (5+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in vacuum behavior
In-Reply-To: <20230121011235.GA10739@nathanxps13>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox