Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2023 11:53:32 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20230808.115332.301701413576096139.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
To: bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: WIP: new system catalog pg_wait_event
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1dc98591-0d06-f0da-bc88-21f529d6fb8e@gmail.com>
References: <3658241.1691161701@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<0109438a-9672-322b-7638-04ad47c97d0f@gmail.com>
	<1dc98591-0d06-f0da-bc88-21f529d6fb8e@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20230808.115332.301701413576096139.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

At Mon, 7 Aug 2023 17:11:50 +0200, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote in 
> That way I think it's flexible enough to add more code if needed in
> the SRF.
> 
> The patch also:
> 
> - updates the doc
> - works with autoconf and meson
> - adds a simple test
> 
> I'm adding a new CF entry for it.

As I mentioned in another thread, I'm uncertain about our stance on
the class id of the wait event. If a class acts as a namespace, we
should include it in the view. Otherwise, if the class id is just an
attribute of the wait event, we should make the event name unique.

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center