public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
To: Anton A. Melnikov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Some performance degradation in REL_16 vs REL_15
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 19:05:22 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

Hi,

On 2023-10-12 11:00:22 +0300, Anton A. Melnikov wrote:
> Found that simple test pgbench -c20 -T20 -j8 gives approximately
> for REL_15_STABLE at 5143f76:  336+-1 TPS
> and
> for REL_16_STABLE at 4ac7635f: 324+-1 TPS
> 
> The performance drop is approximately 3,5%  while the corrected standard deviation is only 0.3%.
> See the raw_data.txt attached.

Could you provide a bit more details about how you ran the benchmark?  The
reason I am asking is that ~330 TPS is pretty slow for -c20.  Even on spinning
rust and using the default settings, I get considerably higher results.

Oh - I do get results closer to yours if I use pgbench scale 1, causing a lot
of row level contention. What scale did you use?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Some performance degradation in REL_16 vs REL_15
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox