Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 16:17:46 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
	Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
	Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	Fujii Masao <fujii@postgresql.org>,
	Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command
Message-ID: <20231017211746.GA823296@nathanxps13>
References: <20230301224751.GA1823946@nathanxps13>
 <20231010234028.iba6wotmp22poxoh@awork3.anarazel.de>
 <20231011025418.GA845134@nathanxps13>
 <20231011032934.GA847236@nathanxps13>
 <20231011033929.j7doct7wzmyw6xiu@awork3.anarazel.de>
 <ZSYeRi9isT7rzZ_a@paquier.xyz>
 <20231011190000.GA894647@nathanxps13>
 <20231017154647.GA611717@nathanxps13>
 <20231017164517.GA613565@nathanxps13>
 <2820645.1697561249@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2820645.1697561249@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20231017211746.GA823296%40nathanxps13>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:47:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
>> ... and it looks like some of the back-branches are failing for Windows.
>> I'm assuming this is because c290e79 was only back-patched to v15.  My
>> first instinct is just to back-patch that one all the way to v11, but maybe
>> there's an alternative involving #ifdef WIN32.  Are there any concerns with
>> back-patching c290e79?
> 
> Sounds fine to me.

Thanks, done.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com