Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rWd9y-006OSI-6L for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2024 14:07:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rWd8x-006DEm-DA for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2024 14:06:47 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rWd8w-006DEe-LX for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2024 14:06:47 +0000 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rWd8t-0052OT-H4 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2024 14:06:45 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE36320094F; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 09:06:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 04 Feb 2024 09:06:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1707055601; x= 1707142001; bh=uqcx/oy7ZdPrCUl7azDxjYPPlL8+m94tVY8la0mdejw=; b=B EDTYYyTGPDGf0JMUY/DWemBloSfuChulPoALGO61dZVLXI66utD4toWs8QMHRN6j Ipd19VYOjVCSQ943h1tH7gvbp0lK6Cb8zaT2jaW9y4uYo6bnxem7tNsvTHP/0b8T OCE1B93SHPdhSm9pfmkuXetujuDbwkiDJN5TJaC5U6Ih4gZjhh0aNVu5PL1MyMjz Dz0wBudk/q0NnqOowH+s5fqNbSXVe/39DHPrP7vADiBRbhofhaUZwAJSoTd6Pf76 msAKR5e1jwt/XzQ5/K7m+nhzTHf1RaIM75I0tx064DIuQNL9umy0yRVtayTszAWT fApmvNe8GQfp8C6ta9GyA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrfedukedgiedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkgggtugfgjgesmhekreertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlvhgr rhhoucfjvghrrhgvrhgruceorghlvhhhvghrrhgvsegrlhhvhhdrnhhoqdhiphdrohhrgh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudelkeekgfdttdettdekgfduvdeiffelteegjeeihfet heekveeftedtuddvhfeunecuffhomhgrihhnpegvnhhtvghrphhrihhsvggusgdrtghomh enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhv hhgvrhhrvgesrghlvhhhrdhnohdqihhprdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ia2694551:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 09:06:40 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alvh.no-ip.org; s=schmee; t=1707055593; bh=2H3lkuUI4Ag8exjHiW/ykG8qU5mlK6i/0g4BwX9U4es=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=oMdkozg7fDUOtXu5DREZN122zgLy+GvzZ/Sz1AExlMarOXc2BkwoZIXZEr7HY+PA6 hTueO7t7PPi2LVKu9qgfWOfAozJ2vKhXyAxAI6A0rmJYhPhDQX7yB5sLEdwAX/KzNu q8NhbZXuIiunMyUO8TXd7laHf8unndjHtJn0LIOPwhwG1nS5NHwbWCPMQB2vLCeVdw FwVlo8AX7JQJNVT3ehri5rk6+5PC7q4QSTjMo3KFp2BziszJf3S9W/83qeWEyjANz9 UIKjAS8sv730ydzYobh3ywgRYS780W7IfEGU725NtintELAnwSfCfPctaqiAhatwhC OdLQx0z6qaOpg== Received: by schmee.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A263FB73; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 15:06:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 15:06:33 +0100 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Dilip Kumar Cc: tender wang , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock Message-ID: <202402041406.3avy4htmv7l4@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="oosk3usamohnxuue" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <202402041338.ewe4xqf37s62@alvherre.pgsql> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --oosk3usamohnxuue Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In short, I propose the attached. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ --oosk3usamohnxuue Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v2-0001-Use-atomics-for-SlruSharedData-latest_page_number.patch" From b4ba8135f8044e0077a27fcf6ad18451380cbcb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alvaro Herrera Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:27:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2] Use atomics for SlruSharedData->latest_page_number --- src/backend/access/transam/clog.c | 6 +--- src/backend/access/transam/commit_ts.c | 7 ++--- src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 28 +++++++++++------- src/backend/access/transam/slru.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++------- src/include/access/slru.h | 5 +++- 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/clog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/clog.c index f6e7da7ffc..f8aa91eb0a 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/clog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/clog.c @@ -766,14 +766,10 @@ StartupCLOG(void) TransactionId xid = XidFromFullTransactionId(TransamVariables->nextXid); int64 pageno = TransactionIdToPage(xid); - LWLockAcquire(XactSLRULock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - /* * Initialize our idea of the latest page number. */ - XactCtl->shared->latest_page_number = pageno; - - LWLockRelease(XactSLRULock); + pg_atomic_write_u64(XactCtl->shared->latest_page_number, pageno); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/commit_ts.c b/src/backend/access/transam/commit_ts.c index 61b82385f3..6bfe60343e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/commit_ts.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/commit_ts.c @@ -689,9 +689,7 @@ ActivateCommitTs(void) /* * Re-Initialize our idea of the latest page number. */ - LWLockAcquire(CommitTsSLRULock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - CommitTsCtl->shared->latest_page_number = pageno; - LWLockRelease(CommitTsSLRULock); + pg_atomic_write_u64(&CommitTsCtl->shared->latest_page_number, pageno); /* * If CommitTs is enabled, but it wasn't in the previous server run, we @@ -1006,7 +1004,8 @@ commit_ts_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * During XLOG replay, latest_page_number isn't set up yet; insert a * suitable value to bypass the sanity test in SimpleLruTruncate. */ - CommitTsCtl->shared->latest_page_number = trunc->pageno; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&CommitTsCtl->shared->latest_page_number, + trunc->pageno); SimpleLruTruncate(CommitTsCtl, trunc->pageno); } diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c index 59523be901..febc429f72 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c @@ -2017,13 +2017,15 @@ StartupMultiXact(void) * Initialize offset's idea of the latest page number. */ pageno = MultiXactIdToOffsetPage(multi); - MultiXactOffsetCtl->shared->latest_page_number = pageno; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&MultiXactOffsetCtl->shared->latest_page_number, + pageno); /* * Initialize member's idea of the latest page number. */ pageno = MXOffsetToMemberPage(offset); - MultiXactMemberCtl->shared->latest_page_number = pageno; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&MultiXactMemberCtl->shared->latest_page_number, + pageno); } /* @@ -2047,14 +2049,15 @@ TrimMultiXact(void) oldestMXactDB = MultiXactState->oldestMultiXactDB; LWLockRelease(MultiXactGenLock); - /* Clean up offsets state */ - LWLockAcquire(MultiXactOffsetSLRULock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - /* * (Re-)Initialize our idea of the latest page number for offsets. */ pageno = MultiXactIdToOffsetPage(nextMXact); - MultiXactOffsetCtl->shared->latest_page_number = pageno; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&MultiXactOffsetCtl->shared->latest_page_number, + pageno); + + /* Clean up offsets state */ + LWLockAcquire(MultiXactOffsetSLRULock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); /* * Zero out the remainder of the current offsets page. See notes in @@ -2081,14 +2084,16 @@ TrimMultiXact(void) LWLockRelease(MultiXactOffsetSLRULock); - /* And the same for members */ - LWLockAcquire(MultiXactMemberSLRULock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - /* + * And the same for members. + * * (Re-)Initialize our idea of the latest page number for members. */ pageno = MXOffsetToMemberPage(offset); - MultiXactMemberCtl->shared->latest_page_number = pageno; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&MultiXactMemberCtl->shared->latest_page_number, + pageno); + + LWLockAcquire(MultiXactMemberSLRULock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); /* * Zero out the remainder of the current members page. See notes in @@ -3333,7 +3338,8 @@ multixact_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * SimpleLruTruncate. */ pageno = MultiXactIdToOffsetPage(xlrec.endTruncOff); - MultiXactOffsetCtl->shared->latest_page_number = pageno; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&MultiXactOffsetCtl->shared->latest_page_number, + pageno); PerformOffsetsTruncation(xlrec.startTruncOff, xlrec.endTruncOff); LWLockRelease(MultiXactTruncationLock); diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/slru.c b/src/backend/access/transam/slru.c index 9ac4790f16..c1d0dfc73b 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/slru.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/slru.c @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ * per-buffer LWLocks that synchronize I/O for each buffer. The control lock * must be held to examine or modify any shared state. A process that is * reading in or writing out a page buffer does not hold the control lock, - * only the per-buffer lock for the buffer it is working on. + * only the per-buffer lock for the buffer it is working on. One exception + * is latest_page_number, which is read and written using atomic ops. * * "Holding the control lock" means exclusive lock in all cases except for * SimpleLruReadPage_ReadOnly(); see comments for SlruRecentlyUsed() for @@ -239,8 +240,7 @@ SimpleLruInit(SlruCtl ctl, const char *name, int nslots, int nlsns, shared->lsn_groups_per_page = nlsns; shared->cur_lru_count = 0; - - /* shared->latest_page_number will be set later */ + pg_atomic_write_u64(&shared->latest_page_number, 0); shared->slru_stats_idx = pgstat_get_slru_index(name); @@ -329,8 +329,16 @@ SimpleLruZeroPage(SlruCtl ctl, int64 pageno) /* Set the LSNs for this new page to zero */ SimpleLruZeroLSNs(ctl, slotno); - /* Assume this page is now the latest active page */ - shared->latest_page_number = pageno; + /* + * Assume this page is now the latest active page. + * + * Note that because both this routine and SlruSelectLRUPage run with + * a bank lock held, it is not possible for this to be zeroing a page + * that SlruSelectLRUPage is going to evict simultaneously -- they would + * both have to hold the same bank lock! Therefore, there's no memory + * barrier here. + */ + pg_atomic_write_u64(&shared->latest_page_number, pageno); /* update the stats counter of zeroed pages */ pgstat_count_slru_page_zeroed(shared->slru_stats_idx); @@ -1113,9 +1121,17 @@ SlruSelectLRUPage(SlruCtl ctl, int64 pageno) shared->page_lru_count[slotno] = cur_count; this_delta = 0; } + + /* + * If this page is the one most recently zeroed, don't consider it + * an eviction candidate. See comments in SimpleLruZeroPage for an + * explanation about the lack of a memory barrier here. + */ this_page_number = shared->page_number[slotno]; - if (this_page_number == shared->latest_page_number) + if (this_page_number == + pg_atomic_read_u64(&shared->latest_page_number)) continue; + if (shared->page_status[slotno] == SLRU_PAGE_VALID) { if (this_delta > best_valid_delta || @@ -1254,7 +1270,6 @@ void SimpleLruTruncate(SlruCtl ctl, int64 cutoffPage) { SlruShared shared = ctl->shared; - int slotno; /* update the stats counter of truncates */ pgstat_count_slru_truncate(shared->slru_stats_idx); @@ -1270,10 +1285,13 @@ SimpleLruTruncate(SlruCtl ctl, int64 cutoffPage) restart: /* - * While we are holding the lock, make an important safety check: the - * current endpoint page must not be eligible for removal. + * An important safety check: the current endpoint page must not be + * eligible for removal. Like SlruSelectLRUPage, we don't need a + * memory barrier here because for the affected page to be relevant, + * we'd have to have the same bank lock as SimpleLruZeroPage. */ - if (ctl->PagePrecedes(shared->latest_page_number, cutoffPage)) + if (ctl->PagePrecedes(pg_atomic_read_u64(&shared->latest_page_number), + cutoffPage)) { LWLockRelease(shared->ControlLock); ereport(LOG, @@ -1282,7 +1300,7 @@ restart: return; } - for (slotno = 0; slotno < shared->num_slots; slotno++) + for (int slotno = 0; slotno < shared->num_slots; slotno++) { if (shared->page_status[slotno] == SLRU_PAGE_EMPTY) continue; diff --git a/src/include/access/slru.h b/src/include/access/slru.h index b05f6bc71d..2109488654 100644 --- a/src/include/access/slru.h +++ b/src/include/access/slru.h @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ typedef enum /* * Shared-memory state + * + * ControlLock is used to protect access to the other fields, except + * latest_page_number, which uses atomics; see comment in slru.c. */ typedef struct SlruSharedData { @@ -95,7 +98,7 @@ typedef struct SlruSharedData * this is not critical data, since we use it only to avoid swapping out * the latest page. */ - int64 latest_page_number; + pg_atomic_uint64 latest_page_number; /* SLRU's index for statistics purposes (might not be unique) */ int slru_stats_idx; -- 2.39.2 --oosk3usamohnxuue--