Feedback-ID: ia2694551:Fastmail
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:31:17 +0100
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: minor tweak to catalogs.sgml pg_class.reltablespace
Message-ID: <202403201431.ladqlq4vnu2t@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <3811691.1710855297@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202403201431.ladqlq4vnu2t%40alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

On 2024-Mar-19, Tom Lane wrote:

> The bit about "(Not meaningful if the relation has no on-disk file.)"
> is not correct, and now it's adjacent to text that contradicts it.
> Maybe more like
> 
>        The tablespace in which this relation is stored.
>        If zero, the database's default tablespace is implied.
>        Not meaningful if the relation has no on-disk file,
>        except for partitioned tables, where this is the tablespace
>        in which partitions will be created when one is not
>        specified in the creation command.

I like that wording, thanks, pushed like that.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Right now the sectors on the hard disk run clockwise, but I heard a rumor that
you can squeeze 0.2% more throughput by running them counterclockwise.
It's worth the effort. Recommended."  (Gerry Pourwelle)