Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sId8O-00Gy9Q-IX for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:48:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sId8J-000z2l-AH for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:48:32 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sId8J-000z2d-0U for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:48:31 +0000 Received: from mail-oa1-x35.google.com ([2001:4860:4864:20::35]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sId8H-001sPH-1I for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:48:31 +0000 Received: by mail-oa1-x35.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-250671a1bc7so1568857fac.3 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 16:48:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=leadboat.com; s=google; t=1718495307; x=1719100107; darn=postgresql.org; h=user-agent:content-disposition:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Oi55887cxWkuuaNaJlyHh5or9TyDYNr17ksDSiY4NeA=; b=H7OYzaLyg0GgF6o3pQ268RNM3GQKGSP7YPzUFBvyKwg1khn4Bmk+EMaaxaVGUP/H4u q6KDWGXKfaaQQmc0B0AFEFeElr6q/zfQT8ryxb/oDupqMPQatUs2gTA/H/XDsI4Ndo+u HkWivvP5M/Bo0w4jWA9FEpoVI1HGta2stUkeA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718495307; x=1719100107; h=user-agent:content-disposition:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Oi55887cxWkuuaNaJlyHh5or9TyDYNr17ksDSiY4NeA=; b=dCSidV18zglMkisJ1q1y+Cx21iP5kt5WldZrc7TQOGvR0YgrGjhYyQ8gbW0L0Uvumw tMkTz1P7mjSZ+x3XiW5ero6eheaFMYjQ3+BLps+sdJW3s9bhERJQ9W1moO0ZAQrqs9F2 v0omW38MhZRuq3zUX8V2rjXJ6hg023oE4JHP53NzdXydNyDVHEiTEPunA51Qd0Ut7ZKR TKluEwonaDuQrD+1TX2C4x3gQQ0arn7q0EpxkRTCWpWZ/A60/rpAjVStK/ll+HRTK7ZO qMwLKRD30bO4BD8GHarHWTJSdddqkM5bedPX38nHmGKcrKqunsUPKWoGirxaESDbBu+c vW5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yys2W/pO1roW4Zsm/s6uMyhAxIJ/FqsWQsXh7x+ixlKd3CPc91q bBsbrr6evMURQuWxKWqtfzGyxs6Is8CQZRGZh514qq+ozX5ppln2LxhOMsSDwQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHEuEkl7YcYFqngFrLm+QFwMGfK1qNNXtHtR7Avs2B12PwE0O+dkTqT/Nj+QbOIMgw0DwvqiQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:63a6:b0:254:bc92:9b97 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-25842c15bf2mr7085215fac.57.1718495306740; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 16:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfd.leadboat.com ([2600:1702:a20:5750::48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 586e51a60fabf-2569930f704sm1769579fac.43.2024.06.15.16.48.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 15 Jun 2024 16:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 16:48:24 -0700 From: Noah Misch To: Robert Haas Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: IPC::Run accepts bug reports Message-ID: <20240615234824.a9@rfd.leadboat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Separating this from the pytest thread: On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 01:26:57PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > The one > thing I know about that *I* think is a pretty big problem about Perl > is that IPC::Run is not really maintained. I don't see in https://github.com/cpan-authors/IPC-Run/issues anything affecting PostgreSQL. If you know of IPC::Run defects, please report them. If I knew of an IPC::Run defect affecting PostgreSQL, I likely would work on it before absurdity like https://github.com/cpan-authors/IPC-Run/issues/175 NetBSD-10-specific behavior coping.